Latch-Free Circuit Breaker Actuator Using Yieldable Support

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional circuit breakers rely on latch mechanisms, which are complex, costly, and difficult to manufacture, and do not allow for independent control of contact closure speed, limiting their performance and efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A latch-free mechanism using a yieldable support that transitions between rigid and flexible configurations, allowing for quick and independent control of electrical contact closure and opening, utilizing a movable arm, biasing means, and a blocking member to facilitate a quick-make and quick-break feature.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a latch mechanism is used to maintain electrical contacts in closed position, then the contacts can be reliably held closed, but the mechanism becomes complex and difficult to manufacture

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontact closure reliabilityVSAvoidlatch mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the latch mechanism entirely from the circuit breaker design. Instead of using a separate latch component to hold the contacts closed, the design relies on the yieldable support's ability to maintain a charged state and the interlocking relationship between the movable arm and blocking member, thereby eliminating the complexity of traditional latch mechanisms while maintaining reliable contact closure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The yieldable support serves multiple functions simultaneously: it stores energy, maintains the charged state, and enables the quick-make feature. The movable arm and blocking member work together in a self-contained manner where the blocking member automatically engages with the movable arm to prevent opening, eliminating the need for separate latching components and reducing overall mechanism complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Speed

If a traditional toggle mechanism is used to achieve quick-make, then contact closure speed is improved, but the contact speed becomes dependent on handle movement speed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontact closure speedVSAvoidindependent control of contact speed
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The yieldable support transitions between two distinct states: charged (rigid) and discharged (flexible). In the charged state, it provides rigid support that prevents movement of the movable arm, enabling rapid contact closure independent of handle speed. This dynamic state change allows the system to achieve quick-make without being constrained by traditional toggle mechanism limitations where contact speed depended on handle movement speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If a latch mechanism with separate engageable members is used, then the contacts can be held closed, but the mechanism requires multiple components increasing manufacturing cost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontact holding capabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the functions of the latch mechanism into the existing yieldable support and movable arm assembly. The yieldable support's rigid configuration inherently provides the holding capability traditionally requiring separate latch members. By merging these functions into fewer components, the design reduces part count, simplifies manufacturing, and lowers cost while maintaining reliable contact holding through the interlocking relationship between the movable arm and blocking member.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Speed

If the yieldable support transitions from rigid to flexible configuration, then the movable arm can move rapidly to close contacts, but the support must withstand compression forces in rigid configuration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontact closure speedVSAvoidcompression force resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The yieldable support dynamically transitions between rigid and flexible states based on operational requirements. In the rigid (charged) state, it is designed to withstand compression forces from the biasing means while preventing movement of the movable arm. When tripped, it transitions to a flexible (discharged) state that allows rapid movement of the movable arm for contact closure. This dynamic state change enables the support to fulfill both strength and speed requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides a simplified, cost-effective, and efficient mechanism for maintaining and opening electrical contacts, enabling rapid closure and opening independent of handle speed, with enhanced performance characteristics compared to conventional latching mechanisms.

Implementation Method 1

a yieldable support having a rigid configuration defining a generally straight axis and a flexible configuration defining a non-straight axis. The yieldable support is operable in the rigid configuration to support a compression force along the straight axis due to and countering the first biasing means

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

a first biasing means operable to apply a force to move the movable arm in a first direction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic potential energy: Spring

Data Source

PatentUS10141137B2Latch-free actuators
Publication Date: 2018.11.27 ABB SPA
  • US10141137B2 patent drawing
  • US10141137B2 patent drawing
  • US10141137B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A latch-free actuator includes, for example, a movable arm, a first biasing element operable to apply a force to move the movable arm in a first direction, and a yieldable support having a rigid configuration defining a generally straight axis and a flexible configuration defining a non-straight axis. The yieldable support is operable in the rigid configuration to support a compression force along the straight axis due to and countering the first biasing element so that the movable arm is prevented from movement in the first direction, and the yieldable support is operable, by applying a tripping force, to the yieldable support to transition the rigid configuration to the flexible configuration to withdraw support of the compression force and allow the movable arm to be moved by the first biasing element in the first direction.