Latched Comparator Precharge Scheme for Low Kickback Noise

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Latching comparators introduce kickback noise due to the manipulation of switches, which limits their precision in comparing input signals.

Innovation Solution

The latching comparator is designed with a precharge phase and a compare phase, where transistors are maintained in saturation mode to reduce switching noise, and isolation modules are used to couple nodes during specific intervals, ensuring that NMOS transistors operate in saturation mode throughout the compare cycle.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If switches are manipulated to control sampling and latching in a latching comparator, then the comparator can perform comparison and latching functions, but kickback noise is introduced at the input nodes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic sampling and latching controlVSAvoidkickback noise
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The comparator operation is divided into distinct phases (precharge phase and compare phase) with separate control logic for each. Switches are controlled independently for precharging nodes versus comparing signals, allowing optimized control for each function and reducing simultaneous switching noise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Nodes are precharged to defined voltage levels before the comparison phase begins. This preliminary action ensures that when the compare phase starts, the nodes are already in the correct state, reducing the duration and intensity of switching transients that cause kickback noise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If transistors are allowed to switch during comparison, then the comparator can change state based on input signals, but switching noise couples back to input nodes reducing precision

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestate change capabilityVSAvoidsignal comparison precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

Isolation switches act as intermediaries between the input nodes and the internal comparator nodes. During the compare phase, these switches are opened to isolate the input nodes from switching activity in the latch and output stages, preventing kickback noise while still allowing the comparator to change state based on the stored node voltages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The comparator operates in periodic cycles with distinct precharge and compare phases. During the compare phase, isolation switches are opened to prevent noise coupling, while state changes are permitted. This periodic switching strategy maintains precision during comparison while enabling necessary state transitions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS8143921B2Latched comparator and methods therefor
Publication Date: 2012.03.27 NXP USA INC
  • US8143921B2 patent drawing
  • US8143921B2 patent drawing
  • US8143921B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A compare cycle of a comparator includes a precharge phase and a compare phase. During the precharge phase, a node of the comparator is precharged to a defined voltage. In addition, during the precharge phase an input transistor of the comparator is decoupled from the node. During the compare phase, an input voltage is coupled to the node via the input transistor. The input transistor is maintained in saturation during both the precharge phase and the compare phase, reducing switching noise.