Latching Element for Ferroelectric Generator Energy Extraction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional explosive ferroelectric generators (FEGs) face significant challenges in maximizing energy extraction due to rapid mechanical deterioration after depolarization, leading to a short window for energy utilization before the device becomes a short circuit, limiting the duration and efficiency of high-voltage pulse generation.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating a latching element between the FEG and the load to prevent current return after depolarization and mechanical fracture, allowing for the capture and controlled release of energy into a capacitive or resistive load, thereby extending the usable energy extraction time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Duration of action of moving object

If a conventional FEG is used without a latching element, then the device structure is simple, but the energy extraction window is extremely short due to rapid mechanical deterioration after depolarization

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy extraction windowVSAvoiddevice structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A latching element is introduced as an intermediary component between the FEG and the load. This element mediates the energy transfer process by capturing energy when the FEG is functional and preventing current return after mechanical fracture, thereby extending the usable energy extraction time without requiring complex modifications to the FEG itself.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The latching element performs preliminary action by capturing and storing energy from the FEG before the mechanical fracture occurs. By latching the energy in advance, the system prepares for the inevitable deterioration of the FEG, ensuring that energy is secured during the brief functional window and can be utilized after the FEG fractures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Loss of energy

If the FEG operates without current return prevention, then the device complexity is low, but energy is lost when current returns to the fractured FEG

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy loss from current returnVSAvoidcurrent management system
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The latching element serves as an intermediary that controls current flow direction. It allows current to flow from the FEG to the load during the functional period, then prevents current from returning to the fractured FEG, effectively managing energy loss without requiring a complex bidirectional current control system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The solution accepts the inevitable mechanical fracture of the FEG as a given condition rather than trying to prevent it. By using a latching element to capture energy before fracture and block current return after fracture, the system converts the harmful effect of mechanical deterioration into a manageable event that doesn't compromise energy extraction efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The latching element effectively isolates the FEG from returned current, ensuring that nearly all released energy is captured and utilized, even after the FEG has fractured, significantly increasing the energy available for subsequent applications.

Implementation Method 1

When the explosive material is detonated, the ferroelectric material becomes depolarized, resulting in a short high voltage, high current output pulse

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPiezoelectric effect: Piezoelectric Effect

Implementation Method 2

Depolarization of the ferroelectric element yields a shockwave of energy traveling from the ferroelectric element

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShock wave: Shock Wave

Implementation Method 3

Incorporating a latching element between the FEG and the load to prevent current return after depolarization and mechanical fracture, allowing for the capture and controlled release of energy into a capacitive or resistive load

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical conduction control: Conduction (electrical)

Data Source

PatentUS11146185B2Systems and methods for generating high voltage pulses
Publication Date: 2021.10.12 RADIANCE TECH
  • US11146185B2 patent drawing
  • US11146185B2 patent drawing
  • US11146185B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A high voltage pulse generating system has a latching element coupled in between a ferroelectric generator (FEG) and a load, such as a vector inversion generator. Such a latching element prevents the return of current to the FEG when the FEG undergoes mechanical destruction after depolarization, thereby increasing the useful amount of energy extracted from the FEG. In some embodiments, multiple FEGs are configured with multiple latching elements to deliver multiple high-voltage, high-current pulses.