Latent-Space Defect Detection for Die-to-Die Wafer Variation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current defect detection methods in semiconductor manufacturing are inadequate for handling die-to-die process variation, are sensitive to reference image quality, require labeled defect candidates for training, and lack selectivity and sensitivity for small defects.

Innovation Solution

A deep metric learning (DML) defect detection model projects test and reference images into latent space to determine distances and detect defects based on these distances, using a learnable low-rank reference image generator to remove noise and enhance defect detection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If unsupervised defect detection methods are used, then detection can be performed without labeled data, but detection depends on the quality of reference images and test images and does not provide selectivity on sensitivity enhancement for targeted defect types

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of implementationVSAvoiddetection sensitivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a learned similarity metric as an intermediary between unsupervised defect detection and supervised approaches. This metric, learned from data, acts as a mediator that enhances the detection sensitivity for targeted defect types while maintaining the unsupervised framework's ease of implementation. The similarity metric transforms the comparison between reference and test images, enabling selective sensitivity enhancement without requiring labeled training data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If supervised defect detection methods are used, then selectivity on sensitivity enhancement for targeted defect types is provided, but a lot of labeled defect candidates are required for training which is time consuming for recipe setup

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection sensitivityVSAvoidrecipe setup time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables the system to learn the similarity metric automatically from the data without requiring manual labeling of defect candidates. The unsupervised learning approach allows the system to self-service by deriving the detection metric directly from the reference and test images, eliminating the time-consuming process of collecting and labeling training data while still achieving selective sensitivity enhancement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of manufacture

If reference image is generated by calculating median or average, then the process is simple, but it is insufficient for dealing with die-to-die process variation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereference image generation simplicityVSAvoidhandling of process variation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the reference image generation process by changing from fixed statistical operations (median/average) to a learned transformation. The similarity metric is learned from the data, allowing it to adapt to die-to-die process variations. This parameter change enables the system to maintain simplicity in the generation process while significantly improving reliability in handling process variations through data-driven adaptation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Reliability

If constructed reference and alternatives based on low-rank approximation are used, then die-to-die process variation is partially addressed, but they are potentially ineffective for sub-regions on a wafer and possibly destroy defect signals

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehandling of process variationVSAvoiddefect signal preservation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by enabling the learned similarity metric to operate at different spatial scales and adapt to local characteristics of sub-regions on the wafer. Rather than applying a global low-rank approximation that may destroy local defect signals, the learned metric can be tuned to preserve local features while still addressing die-to-die process variations. This allows different parts of the wafer to be handled with appropriate sensitivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS12626354B2Learnable defect detection for semiconductor applications
Publication Date: 2026.05.12 KLA CORP
  • US12626354B2 patent drawing
  • US12626354B2 patent drawing
  • US12626354B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems for learnable defect detection for semiconductor applications are provided. One system includes a deep metric learning defect detection model configured for projecting a test image for a specimen and a corresponding reference image into latent space, determining a distance in the latent space between one or more different portions of the test image and corresponding portion(s) of the corresponding reference image, and detecting defects in the one or more different portions of the test image based on the determined distances. Another system includes a learnable low-rank reference image generator configured for removing noise from one or more test images for a specimen thereby generating one or more reference images corresponding to the one or more test images.