Latent-Space Sampling of Complex Probability Distributions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods face challenges in efficiently extracting sample data pieces that conform to complex probability distributions, particularly in high-dimensional spaces, leading to increased rejection rates and prolonged processing times.

Innovation Solution

A method utilizing a machine learning model that maps a data space to a latent space with a simpler probability distribution, employing a variational autoencoder to perform local transitions in the latent space, adjusting the proposal method based on the sampling target, and calculating adoption probabilities to improve sampling efficiency and accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the pure Monte Carlo method is used to extract sample data pieces from a complex probability distribution, then the sampling process is simple, but the extraction efficiency is low and rejection rate is high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesampling efficiencyVSAvoidsampling accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a machine learning model as an intermediary between the complex probability distribution and the sampling process. The model learns the complex distribution and uses it to generate proposals, thereby improving both sampling efficiency and accuracy without directly modifying the underlying complex distribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary training of the machine learning model on the complex probability distribution before actual sampling. This preliminary action allows the model to internalize the distribution characteristics, enabling more efficient and accurate sampling during the subsequent sampling phase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If a machine learning model is introduced to improve sampling efficiency, then the sampling accuracy improves, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesampling efficiencyVSAvoidmodel complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the complex probability distribution into a simpler form through the machine learning model's learned representation. By changing the parameterization of the distribution, the model can generate samples more efficiently while maintaining accuracy, effectively reducing the computational complexity of the sampling process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If random sampling is performed from the entire latent space, then the coverage is comprehensive, but the rejection rate increases due to poor proposal quality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesampling coverageVSAvoidproposal acceptance rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from uniform random sampling across the entire latent space to local sampling around the current point. This local quality approach generates higher-quality proposals that are more likely to be accepted, thereby improving the acceptance rate while maintaining adequate coverage through sequential sampling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20250315654A1Method and apparatus for information processing
Publication Date: 2025.10.09 FUJITSU LTD
  • US20250315654A1 patent drawing
  • US20250315654A1 patent drawing
  • US20250315654A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer acquires first sample data included in a data space which conforms to a first probability distribution. The computer selects, by use of a machine learning model that maps the data space and a latent space which conforms to a second probability distribution to each other, a second latent representation in the latent space based on a first latent representation in the latent space. The first latent representation corresponds to the first sample data. The computer outputs, by use of the machine learning model, second sample data corresponding to the second latent representation from among sample data included in the data space.