Machining Tool Lateral Coolant Outlet Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing machining tools face limitations in coolant flow rate due to small cross-sectional areas of coolant outlets, which restrict effective flooding of cutting edges and machining points, and often require complex production processes for clamping ribs with coolant bores.

Innovation Solution

The tool features a holder with a shank and a cutting insert receptacle, where coolant outlets are arranged on the workpiece-side end face alongside the receptacle, allowing for increased cross-sectional area and flow rate, and eliminating the need for bores in clamping ribs, with optional additional outlets for directed coolant jets.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If coolant outlets are arranged in the cutting insert or directly above the receptacle, then directed coolant jet can be achieved, but the cross-sectional area of coolant outlets is limited and flow rate is restricted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoolant flow rateVSAvoidcross-sectional area of coolant outlet
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The coolant outlets are positioned in a coolant outlet plane that is offset from the cutting insert plane, utilizing the lateral dimension alongside the receptacle rather than being confined to the cutting insert or directly above it. This dimensional shift allows for significantly larger cross-sectional areas while maintaining effective coolant delivery to the machining point through the lateral arrangement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Quantity of substance

If coolant outlets are arranged alongside the cutting insert receptacle with increased cross-sectional area, then coolant flow rate is enhanced, but the device structure becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoolant flow rateVSAvoidholder structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The holder structure is segmented into distinct functional zones: the cutting insert receptacle area and the coolant outlet area. The coolant outlets are arranged in a separate coolant outlet plane that is offset from the cutting insert plane, allowing independent optimization of each zone. This segmentation enables enhanced coolant flow through larger outlets without complicating the clamping rib structure, as the coolant bores are positioned in the holder body rather than integrated into the clamping rib itself.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If coolant bores are integrated into clamping ribs, then directed coolant delivery is achieved, but production process becomes complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoolant delivery precisionVSAvoidproduction process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The coolant delivery function is extracted from the clamping rib structure and positioned in separate coolant bores within the holder body. The coolant outlets are arranged in a coolant outlet plane offset from the cutting insert plane, allowing coolant to be delivered to the machining point without requiring complex integration of coolant bores into the clamping rib. This separation simplifies the manufacturing process while maintaining reliable coolant delivery.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration enhances coolant flooding of cutting edges and machining points, increasing flow rate without the complexity of producing bores in clamping ribs, while maintaining tool width and allowing for tailored coolant distribution based on application parameters.

Implementation Method 1

a coolant bore (28), which opens out into a plurality of coolant outlets (44), that are arranged on the workpiece-side end face (16)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid flow:

Implementation Method 2

the coolant is discharged in the direction of the cutting insert (14), in particular in the direction of an active cutting edge (22)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal conduction: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 3

coolant is discharged towards the cutting insert

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConvection: Convection

Data Source

PatentUS9346103B2Tool for the machining of a workpiece with lateral coolant outlet
Publication Date: 2016.05.24 HARTMETALL WERKZEUGFAB PAUL HORN
  • US9346103B2 patent drawing
  • US9346103B2 patent drawing
  • US9346103B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A tool for machining a workpiece is presented. The tool has a cutting insert with at least one cutting edge, a holder having a shank, and a cutting insert receptacle, wherein the cutting insert receptacle is arranged in a region of a workpiece-side end face of the shank, and the cutting insert is disposed in the cutting insert receptacle. The holder has a coolant bore, which opens out into a plurality of coolant outlets. The plurality of coolant outlets are arranged on the workpiece-side end face of the shank, alongside the cutting insert receptacle, and are oriented such that coolant is discharged towards the cutting insert. At least some of the coolant outlets lie in a coolant outlet plane which runs parallel to and offset from a cutting insert plane running through the cutting insert receptacle, where the coolant outlet plane and the cutting insert plane run parallel to the longitudinal direction of the shank.