Lathe Grip-Change Control for Long Bar Machining

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional machine tool systems waste material, energy, time, and labor when manufacturing long products by performing grip changes during machining cycles, as they often result in unfinished products due to the spindle's limited movable range.

Innovation Solution

A machine tool system with a bar length shortage prior determination unit that determines whether a grip change can be performed during the machining cycle before it starts, allowing for accurate positioning and reducing wasteful machining by comparing the remaining bar length with a specified or calculated distance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the spindle performs grip changes during a machining cycle to manufacture long products exceeding its movable range, then the ability to manufacture long products is improved, but material waste increases due to unfinished products when the pusher reaches the bar length shortage position

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to manufacture long productsVSAvoidmaterial waste
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary determination of the pusher position before the machining cycle starts. The bar length shortage determination unit calculates whether the pusher will reach the bar length shortage position during the machining cycle, and if so, the machine controller aborts the machining cycle before it begins, preventing material waste from unfinished products.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from the bar length shortage determination unit to control the machining cycle. The determination unit continuously monitors the pusher position and provides feedback to the machine controller, which uses this information to decide whether to proceed with or abort the machining cycle, thereby preventing material waste.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If the spindle performs grip changes during a machining cycle, then long products can be manufactured, but energy waste increases due to aborted machining cycles

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to manufacture long productsVSAvoidenergy waste
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary determination of the pusher position before the machining cycle starts. By calculating in advance whether the pusher will reach the bar length shortage position, the system avoids starting energy-consuming machining cycles that would inevitably be aborted, thereby reducing energy waste.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The feedback mechanism provides real-time information about the pusher position to the machine controller, enabling informed decisions about whether to proceed with energy-consuming machining operations, thus preventing unnecessary energy expenditure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If the spindle performs grip changes during a machining cycle, then long products can be manufactured, but time waste increases due to aborted machining cycles

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to manufacture long productsVSAvoidtime waste
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary determination of the pusher position before the machining cycle starts. By calculating in advance whether the pusher will reach the bar length shortage position, the system avoids time-consuming aborted machining cycles and prepares appropriate actions beforehand.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The feedback mechanism enables real-time monitoring and decision-making, allowing the system to respond quickly to pusher position changes and avoid time waste from aborted operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Adaptability or versatility

If the spindle performs grip changes during a machining cycle, then long products can be manufactured, but labor waste increases due to discarded unfinished products

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to manufacture long productsVSAvoidlabor efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary determination of the pusher position before the machining cycle starts, preventing the creation of unfinished products that would require manual intervention for removal and disposal, thereby reducing labor requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The feedback mechanism enables automatic decision-making and control, reducing the need for manual monitoring and intervention, thus improving labor efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP4360782A1Machine tool system and method of controlling machine tool system
Publication Date: 2024.05.01 STAR MICRONICS CO LTD
  • EP4360782A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4360782A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4360782A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A lathe system 1 capable of manufacturing a long product from a bar W by performing a grip change by a spindle 25 during a machining cycle, the long product being of a length exceeding a movable range of the spindle 25, the spindle 25 releasably gripping the bar W and moving in a Z 1-axis direction of the bar W. The lathe system 1 includes a pusher 44 capable of moving in the Z1-axis direction together with the bar W. The lathe system 1 further includes a bar length shortage prior determination unit 20b that determines whether the pusher 44 is in a position permitting the grip change to be performed during the machining cycle. The determination is made prior to the start of the machining cycle.