NC Lathe Controller Logic for Tool Post Usage Switching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional NC lathes require special machining programs to manage simultaneous machining operations when one tool post is in use and another is not, leading to inefficiencies and potential unintended machining.

Innovation Solution

A machine tool with a controller that determines whether a first tool post is used based on a machining program, allowing simultaneous or stopped operation of systems to avoid unintended machining, eliminating the need for special programs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the first system is continuously operated to maintain productivity, then productivity is improved, but unintended machining of the front side of the workpiece occurs when the first tool post is not needed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontinuous machining capabilityVSAvoidunintended machining
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The controller monitors the machining program to detect whether the first tool post is scheduled for use in subsequent operations. Based on this feedback information, the controller automatically adjusts the operation state of the first system - suspending it when the tool post is not needed and resuming it when needed. This closed-loop control prevents unintended machining while maintaining productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The operational state of the first system is made dynamic rather than static. The system can automatically transition between active and suspended states based on real-time analysis of the machining program. This dynamic adjustment allows the system to optimize between continuous operation for productivity and selective suspension to prevent harmful unintended machining.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Object-affected harmful factors

If a special machining program is written to control tool post usage, then unintended machining is prevented, but device complexity and programming difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveunintended machining preventionVSAvoidprogramming complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller is equipped with automatic analysis capability that allows it to self-determine whether the first tool post is needed based on the machining program content. Instead of requiring the operator to write complex special programs, the controller autonomously analyzes the program instructions and makes intelligent decisions about system suspension and resumption, greatly simplifying the programming task.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical approach of writing complex special programs with an intelligent control system that automatically analyzes and decides. The controller uses software-based logic to substitute for the complex programming work, transforming a manual, error-prone process into an automated, reliable system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If the first system is suspended to prevent unintended machining, then unintended machining is prevented, but productivity decreases when the first tool post could be used

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveunintended machining preventionVSAvoidmachining efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller continuously monitors the machining program to determine the actual usage requirements of the first tool post. This feedback mechanism ensures that the first system is suspended only when truly unnecessary, and remains active when the tool post is needed, thereby preventing unintended machining while avoiding unnecessary productivity loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The operational parameters of the first system (active/suspended state) are dynamically changed based on program analysis results. This parameter adjustment is precisely controlled to match the actual machining needs, optimizing the balance between preventing unintended machining and maintaining productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12405597B2Machine tool
Publication Date: 2025.09.02 STAR MICRONICS CO LTD
  • US12405597B2 patent drawing
  • US12405597B2 patent drawing
  • US12405597B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A controller of a machine tool determines in accordance with a machining program whether a first tool post is used to machine an unfinished workpiece. When the unfinished workpiece needs machining before terminating a continuous machining and when the controller determines that the first tool post is used to machine the unfinished workpiece W2, the controller simultaneously advances a first system and a second system in accordance with the machining program while preventing machining a workpiece held by the first spindle. When the controller determines that the first tool post is not used to machine the unfinished workpiece, the controller stops the first system and advances the second system in accordance with the machining program.