Additively Manufactured Strut With Lattice Crush Energy Absorption

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current aircraft passenger seat components lack energy absorbing and load limiting features, leading to unpredictable plastic deformations and structural failures during crashes, resulting in occupant injury and seat damage.

Innovation Solution

An additively manufactured energy absorbing strut device with a cylinder body, piston, and deformable elements, including an annular lattice structure and crushable tube, that undergo predictable plastic deformation to absorb impact energy and limit loads.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If conventional manufacturing processes are used for seat components, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but energy absorption capability and predictable failure mechanisms are lacking

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy absorption capabilityVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The strut device is divided into distinct functional segments: a cylinder body portion and a piston portion with deformable elements. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized for its specific function (energy absorption, load limitation) while maintaining overall structural integrity, resolving the contradiction between energy absorption capability and structural complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes additive manufacturing to change the manufacturing parameters and enable complex geometries (lattice structures, variable density regions) that are impossible with conventional manufacturing. This parameter change allows the strut to achieve predictable failure mechanisms and energy absorption characteristics without compromising manufacturability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If seat components are designed without energy absorbing features, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but reliability during crash scenarios deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepredictable failure mechanismVSAvoidcomponent design complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The deformable elements (lattice structures, crushable features) are pre-designed with specific geometric configurations that ensure predictable failure modes at predetermined load thresholds. This preliminary action during design ensures reliable energy absorption during crashes without requiring complex control systems or additional components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The strut device employs composite structural designs combining solid metal regions with lattice structures and hollow crushable elements. This composite approach enables predictable progressive collapse mechanisms that enhance reliability during impact while maintaining reasonable design complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Manufacturing precision

If additive manufacturing is used for the strut device, then manufacturing precision and customizable geometries are improved, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegeometric precisionVSAvoidmanufacturing process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the cylinder body and piston portions into a single additively manufactured component. This consolidation eliminates the need for separate manufacturing processes, assembly steps, and associated tolerances, thereby improving geometric precision while actually simplifying the manufacturing process despite the complex geometry

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The strut device provides controlled energy absorption and load limitation, preventing structural failures and reducing injury risk by utilizing additive manufacturing for customizable, predictable failure mechanisms.

Implementation Method 1

An energy absorbing strut device with a cylinder body, piston, and deformable elements, including an annular lattice structure and crushable tube, that undergo predictable plastic deformation to absorb impact energy and limit loads

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPlastic deformation: Plasticity

Data Source

PatentUS12429105B2Additively manufactured energy absorbing strut device
Publication Date: 2025.09.30 BE AEROSPACE INC
  • US12429105B2 patent drawing
  • US12429105B2 patent drawing
  • US12429105B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An additively manufactured strut device including a cylinder body forming a chamber and a piston having a first part disposed in the internal chamber and a second part disposed outside of the chamber. A first deformable element formed as a lattice structure breaks to permit initial withdrawal of the piston when a tensive threshold is met and a second deformable crushes during continued withdrawal of the piston. In further embodiments, a third deformable element formed as a lattice structure may be collocated with the second deformable element. The strut may be manufactured by an additive manufacturing process. Applications for the energy absorbing strut include aircraft seat frames among other applications.