One-Piece Lattice Interbody Cage for Bone Infiltration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing interbody cages lack effective integration with bone tissue, leading to inadequate reinforcement and stability in spinal fusion procedures, particularly in areas affected by intervertebral disk lesions and degeneration.

Innovation Solution

A one-piece interbody cage with a lattice or grid structure, manufactured through sintering techniques like electron beam melting or laser sintering, featuring a compact outer frame and an inner grid body, allowing bone growth into the structure for enhanced integration and stability, while maintaining sufficient strength and rigidity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If a solid cage structure is used, then strength and rigidity are improved, but bone tissue infiltration and integration are worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecage strengthVSAvoidbone integration
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The cage incorporates a lattice structure with interconnected struts forming void spaces, allowing bone tissue to infiltrate and integrate with the implant. This porous architecture provides both mechanical support and pathways for bone growth, resolving the contradiction between strength and bone integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

Solution Approach 2:

The cage combines solid structural elements (struts and ribs) with empty spaces (voids and interstices) to create a composite structure. The solid portions provide strength and rigidity, while the void portions enable bone infiltration, achieving both requirements simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Reliability

If a lattice structure is used, then bone infiltration is improved, but strength and rigidity are worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebone integrationVSAvoidcage strength
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The cage applies different structural qualities to different regions: solid ribs and struts in load-bearing areas provide strength, while lattice openings in contact areas facilitate bone infiltration. This local differentiation resolves the contradiction between strength and bone integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The cage is divided into multiple structural segments (longitudinal ribs, transverse ribs, struts) that work together. The segmented lattice structure distributes mechanical loads while maintaining open spaces for bone growth, balancing strength and infiltration requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Ease of manufacture

If a one-piece structure is used, then manufacturing simplicity is improved, but adaptability to different spinal dimensions is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidsize adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The cage dimensions (length, width, height, strut thickness) are designed as adjustable parameters that can be modified to match different spinal anatomies. The lattice structure allows systematic variation of geometric parameters while maintaining the same manufacturing process, achieving adaptability without increasing manufacturing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The lattice structure promotes bone infiltration and fusion, providing a firm connection between the cage and vertebral bodies, ensuring stability and integration even under pressure, thus improving spinal reinforcement and fusion outcomes.

Implementation Method 1

prepared, in particular, by sintering, such as by means of electron beam melting or laser sintering

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectron beam melting: Electron Beam

Implementation Method 2

prepared, in particular, by sintering, such as by means of electron beam melting or laser sintering

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser sintering: Laser

Data Source

PatentUS10226357B2Interbody cage
Publication Date: 2019.03.12 JOIMAX GMBH
  • US10226357B2 patent drawing
  • US10226357B2 patent drawing
  • US10226357B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An interbody cage, which has lattice-like or grid-like areas for better connection/fusion into the area of the vertebra. The cage has especially an outer frame, which includes massive support parts and, and an inner grid body. The frame determining the outer contour and the lattice or grid areas located within same are made in one piece. The cage is prepared by sintering, such as by electron beam melting or laser sintering.