Laundry Appliance Slider Interface to Reduce Setting Complexity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Users of laundry treatment appliances face confusion and suboptimal performance due to the numerous settings and load type selections, leading to inefficient washing and drying processes.

Innovation Solution

A slider-based user interface with a fabric slider control and a cycle modifier slider control allows users to select from predefined settings, enabling easy configuration of laundry treatment cycles by modifying default settings for specific fabrics and load types.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multiple detailed settings and load type selections are provided, then laundry treatment performance can be optimized, but user confusion and operational complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelaundry treatment performanceVSAvoiduser confusion
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The user interface is segmented into two distinct control mechanisms: a fabric selector that identifies fabric type and a cycle modifier that adjusts treatment intensity. This segmentation allows the system to maintain multiple detailed settings for performance optimization while presenting a simplified two-step interaction model to users, thereby resolving the contradiction between performance and ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The microprocessor acts as an intermediary that receives simple user inputs (fabric type and cycle modification level) and automatically translates them into the appropriate combination of multiple detailed settings. This intermediary function allows the system to provide optimized laundry treatment without exposing users to the complexity of individual setting adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If multiple detailed settings and load type selections are provided, then laundry treatment performance can be optimized, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelaundry treatment performanceVSAvoidsettings complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The complexity of selecting and coordinating multiple detailed settings is extracted from the user interface and consolidated into the microprocessor's automated control logic. Users only interact with two simple controls, while the microprocessor handles the complex task of translating these inputs into the appropriate combination of water temperature, agitation level, cycle duration, and other treatment parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-service by automatically determining the appropriate treatment settings based on the fabric type and desired cycle modification. The microprocessor autonomously configures multiple detailed settings without requiring users to manually adjust each parameter, thereby maintaining high treatment performance while reducing the apparent device complexity for users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If manual load type selection is required, then user control over settings is improved, but user burden and time consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser controlVSAvoiduser burden
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by automatically configuring the appropriate treatment settings as soon as the user selects a fabric type and cycle modification level. This eliminates the need for users to manually adjust multiple individual settings, significantly reducing time consumption and user burden while maintaining adaptability through the two-step selection process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The two-step control mechanism serves multiple functions: it identifies fabric type, determines treatment parameters, adjusts cycle duration, and optimizes energy consumption. This universal control approach allows the system to maintain user adaptability while consolidating what would otherwise require multiple separate user actions into a single efficient interaction sequence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS10988882B2Laundry treatment appliance slider-based user interface
Publication Date: 2021.04.27 MIDEA GROUP CO LTD
  • US10988882B2 patent drawing
  • US10988882B2 patent drawing
  • US10988882B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A laundry treatment appliance, program product and method utilize a slider-based user interface to facilitate user selection of settings for a laundry treatment cycle. A slider-based user interface, for example, may include a fabric slider control that receives user input that selects from among a plurality of fabric selections and a cycle modifier slider control that receives user input that selects from among a plurality of cycle modifier selections capable of increasing and/or decreasing various default settings associated with various fabric selections.