Value Allocation System for Law Firm Profitability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current billing and timekeeping systems for professional firms, especially large law firms with global presence, lack advanced features for global billing and financial management, client relationship tracking, and profitability analysis, and do not effectively allocate value to timekeepers based on client profitability and payment promptness.

Innovation Solution

A system that allocates billing and collection value proportionally to timekeepers based on client profitability and payment behavior, using a weighted value system that normalizes collections and billings across different clients and timekeepers, and automatically predicts cash flow and partner profits, allowing real-time client billing visibility.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional billing systems are used, then basic time tracking is possible, but they cannot effectively allocate value to timekeepers based on client profitability and payment behavior

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalue allocation accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments clients into different profitability tiers and segments timekeeper work into billable and non-billable categories. This segmentation allows for differentiated value allocation based on client profitability metrics while maintaining clear tracking of individual timekeeper contributions to each segment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of time value from a uniform hourly rate to a dynamic weighted value that varies based on client profitability, payment behavior, and work type. This parameter transformation enables more precise measurement of actual value generated by different timekeepers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If uniform billing rates are applied to all timekeepers, then simplicity is maintained, but fairness in profit sharing is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebilling simplicityVSAvoidprofit sharing fairness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different billing rates and value weights to different timekeepers based on their local characteristics - which clients they serve, the profitability of those clients, and the type of work they perform. This local quality approach maintains operational simplicity through automated rules while achieving fairness through differentiated valuation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Loss of information

If detailed tracking of all timekeeper activities is implemented, then precise profitability analysis is achieved, but data collection complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprofitability information completenessVSAvoiddata collection complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses a universal data collection framework that serves multiple functions: tracking timekeeper activities, categorizing work types, identifying clients, and calculating profitability metrics. This multi-functionality reduces data collection complexity by consolidating what could be separate complex systems into a single integrated platform.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Device complexity

If manual profit sharing calculations are used, then system simplicity is maintained, but calculation accuracy and dispute resolution efficiency decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidprofit calculation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs automated profit sharing calculations using pre-defined rules and algorithms that evaluate client profitability, timekeeper contributions, and work categories. This self-service calculation approach eliminates manual intervention while ensuring consistent, accurate, and transparent profit distribution across all timekeepers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentEP3979173A1Improved system and method for allocating value to timekeeper work
Publication Date: 2022.04.06 SHAABAN AHMED FAROUK
  • EP3979173A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3979173A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3979173A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The present invention relates to a computer system configured to determine profit allocation, the computer system comprising: an application server comprising a processing device and a non-transitory storage medium for storing instructions that when executed by the processing device cause the processing device to perform the following: receive a Billing Entity ID corresponding to a Billing Entity within a company; log time Billed and Time Collected by the Billing Entity for a client; ping a third party website to retrieve information regarding the stability of the client; create a plurality of predetermined rules to calculate a Billing Entity Factor, which is proportional to the time collected divided by the time billed by the Billing Entity, and adjust the Billing Entity Factor based on the information regarding the stability of the client; and determine profit allocation for the Billing Entity based on the adjusted Billing Entity Factor.