Lawn Mower Path Replanning After Obstacle Boundary Changes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional intelligent mowing robots face inefficiencies in path planning due to external changes like obstacle addition or removal, lacking complete automatic correction logic, which affects mowing efficiency and task completion.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for path planning that includes starting a boundary editing interface, detecting user instructions for obstacle addition or removal, deleting relevant data, reloading boundary information, and generating updated path planning through a preset algorithm, allowing for real-time display of updated diagrams and information without manual intervention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional obstacle avoidance operations are performed after obstacle addition or removal, then the robot can avoid collisions, but the mowing efficiency is greatly reduced due to unnecessary obstacle avoidance operations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobstacle avoidance capabilityVSAvoidmowing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring obstacle information and automatically triggering boundary re-planning when obstacle changes are detected. The upper computer receives real-time obstacle data, determines whether re-planning is needed, and updates the boundary information, creating a closed-loop control system that balances safety and efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-establishing boundary information and path planning algorithms that can quickly adapt to obstacle changes. When an obstacle is added or removed, the system has pre-configured mechanisms to automatically update boundary data and recalculate paths, avoiding the need for time-consuming manual intervention during operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Manufacturing precision

If manual boundary re-planning is performed after obstacle changes, then the path planning accuracy is improved, but the time consumption and operational complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepath planning accuracyVSAvoidre-planning time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service by enabling automatic boundary re-planning without manual intervention. When obstacle changes are detected, the upper computer automatically triggers the boundary re-planning process, retrieves updated boundary information, and executes path recalculation, making the system self-sufficient in adapting to environmental changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual mechanical boundary adjustment with automated electronic control. Instead of manually modifying boundary parameters, the system uses electronic algorithms to automatically recalculate boundaries and paths based on updated obstacle information, substituting human operation with computational processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If complete automatic correction logic is implemented for boundary processing, then the mowing efficiency is improved, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemowing efficiencyVSAvoidautomatic correction logic complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the automatic correction logic into distinct functional modules: obstacle change detection, boundary information retrieval, path re-planning algorithm execution, and result display. Each module handles a specific aspect of the correction process, making the overall complex system manageable through modular design and clear separation of concerns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The upper computer serves as an intermediary between the mower and the boundary re-planning system. It receives obstacle change notifications, coordinates the boundary re-planning process, and manages data flow between different components, simplifying the control architecture by centralizing the coordination function in a dedicated intermediary device.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS11252864B2Method and system for path planning after removing or adding obstacle from/to lawn to be mowed
Publication Date: 2022.02.22 CHONGQING RATO INTELLIGENT EQUIP CO LTD
  • US11252864B2 patent drawing
  • US11252864B2 patent drawing
  • US11252864B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure discloses a method for path planning after removing an obstacle from a lawn to be mowed, the method including: starting a boundary editing interface for the lawn to be mowed to display inner boundary information; detecting an obstacle selection and removal instruction of a user; deleting information data that is stored in a memory and/or database and associated with the information mark of the obstacle to be removed; reloading all currently-stored boundary information; and displaying the updated schematic diagram of the lawn and the updated path planning information on a display screen. The present disclosure also discloses a method and system for path planning after adding an obstacle to a lawn to be mowed, and a system for path planning after removing an obstacle from a lawn to be mowed.