3D Print Layer Plausibility Check for Orientation Errors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Additive manufacturing processes, such as stereolithography, face issues with orientation errors leading to unnecessary support structures, which complicate the printing process and result in suboptimal surface quality due to incorrect contact between objects and the printing base, often requiring manual correction and additional effort.

Innovation Solution

A plausibility check method that analyzes the output data from CAM software by comparing the pixel sum of successive layers, emitting warnings or errors if the pixel sum increases by a predetermined factor, allowing for early detection and correction of orientation errors before printing, thereby minimizing the need for support structures and ensuring high-quality surfaces.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the object is rotated into the optimal virtual build plane to ensure full contact with the zero plane, then the contact between the object and zero plane is improved, but the complexity of data preparation and orientation adjustment increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontact between object and zero planeVSAvoiddata preparation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary detection of orientation errors by comparing pixel sums of successive layers before the actual printing process. This early detection allows for corrective actions to be taken in advance, preventing the need for complex post-processing and re-orientation adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the pixel sum comparison results are used to generate warnings or error signals that feed back into the data preparation process. This feedback loop enables automatic detection and correction of orientation issues without requiring manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If support structures are automatically created by CAM software to prevent printing errors, then the reliability of the printing process is improved, but the surface quality and cleanup effort deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprinting process reliabilityVSAvoidsurface quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary detection of orientation errors before printing begins, allowing for corrective actions to be taken in the data preparation stage. This prevents the need for support structures in areas where they would compromise surface quality, as the orientation issues are corrected beforehand.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary anti-action by detecting and correcting orientation errors before they can cause printing failures that would necessitate support structures. The pixel sum comparison identifies potential problems in advance, allowing the CAM software to adjust the build orientation or generate appropriate warnings before support structures would be unnecessarily added.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

3Ease of operation

If the pixel sum comparison threshold is set to a high value to reduce false warnings, then the ease of operation is improved, but the detection precision of orientation errors deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewarning system usabilityVSAvoidorientation error detection precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs parameter changes by using a predetermined factor (such as 2 or 3) to compare pixel sums between successive layers. This factor-based approach provides a balanced threshold that is sensitive enough to detect genuine orientation errors while being robust against normal variations in layer geometry, optimizing both detection precision and ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP4147807B1Plausibility test for additive production methods, in particular rapid prototyping devices
Publication Date: 2024.07.24 IVOCLAR VIVADENT AG
  • EP4147807B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4147807B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP4147807B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

The invention relates to a plausibility check method for rapid prototyping devices, in particular stereolithography devices. Here, input data (14), which is in particular in the form of graphic data and of which each file represents a layer, is checked. Each layer has a plurality of pixels. The component to be printed in the respective layer is generated by the rapid prototyping device based on output data. The input data of two successive layers are checked, and the sum of all pixels to be exposed is determined for each layer. A signal (22) is output, in particular as a warning signal (26), if the pixel sum of a subsequent layer is greater than that of the previous layer by a predetermined factor.