Layer 1 Layer 2 Protection Switching Coordination

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional approaches to avoid sympathetic switches at Layer 2 during Layer 1 protection or maintenance activities in optical networks delay fault propagation, leading to inefficient Layer 2 protection mechanisms that are not always guaranteed and assume constant Layer 1 protection availability.

Innovation Solution

A method for coordinating Layer 1 and Layer 2 protection switching by communicating defects and recovery actions between Layer 1 and Layer 2 networks using Connectivity Fault Management (CFM) frames with added information, allowing for dynamic Layer 2 protection coordination based on Layer 1 recovery actions, such as preventing, timing, or immediate switching.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If hold-off timer is used to delay Layer 1 defect propagation to Layer 2, then sympathetic switches at Layer 2 are avoided, but Layer 2 protection response time is increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveavoidance of sympathetic switchesVSAvoidLayer 2 protection response time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by notifying Layer 2 of Layer 1 defects immediately through CFM messages, but Layer 2 protection switching is conditionally delayed based on the hold-off timer status and recovery action information. This allows Layer 2 to be aware of the defect upfront while controlling the actual switching timing to avoid sympathetic switches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback by including recovery action information in CFM messages sent from Layer 1 to Layer 2. This feedback mechanism allows Layer 2 to understand whether Layer 1 is attempting recovery, enabling intelligent decision-making about whether to trigger protection switching at Layer 2.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If CCM timeout is set greater than mesh restoration time, then Layer 2 protection operates after Layer 1 recovery, but failure detection for Ethernet segments is significantly delayed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoordination with Layer 1 recoveryVSAvoidfailure detection time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by sending CFM defect notification messages immediately when Layer 1 defects are detected, without waiting for CCM timeout. This allows Layer 2 to detect failures immediately and prepare for potential protection switching, rather than waiting for the extended CCM timeout period.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces CFM messages as an intermediary mechanism between Layer 1 and Layer 2 for defect notification. This intermediary allows defect information to be transmitted immediately through a dedicated channel, bypassing the slow CCM timeout mechanism while still maintaining coordination with Layer 1 recovery actions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Speed

If Layer 2 protection operates independently without Layer 1 coordination, then Layer 2 protection speed is improved, but sympathetic switches cannot be avoided

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveLayer 2 protection switching speedVSAvoidavoidance of sympathetic switches
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback by sending recovery action information from Layer 1 to Layer 2 through CFM messages. This allows Layer 2 to make informed decisions about protection switching based on Layer 1's recovery status, avoiding sympathetic switches while maintaining fast response through independent operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies dynamics by making Layer 2 protection switching behavior adaptive based on received CFM messages. When recovery actions are detected, Layer 2 can dynamically adjust its switching behavior to coordinate with Layer 1, while maintaining the ability to operate independently and quickly when no coordination is needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS10491318B1Systems and methods for coordinating layer 1 and layer 2 protection switching techniques for efficient layer 2 traffic recovery
Publication Date: 2019.11.26 CIENA CORP
  • US10491318B1 patent drawing
  • US10491318B1 patent drawing
  • US10491318B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods of coordinating Layer 1 and Layer 2 protection switching include, at a node having a plurality of ports including a first port that is an endpoint of a Layer 1 network and a second port that connects to a Layer 2 network, communicating defects in the Layer 1 network to a local Maintenance End Point (MEP) on the second port and any recovery actions being performed in the Layer 1 network; informing other nodes on the Layer 2 network via the second port of the defects and the recovery actions; and coordinating Layer 2 protection switching in the Layer 2 network based on the defects and based on the recovery actions in the Layer 1 network.