Layered Emissions Feedback for Campus Energy and Air Quality

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current building management systems lack the capability to holistically manage air quality and energy consumption across campuses, relying on outdated technologies that do not support real-time data processing, layered feedback systems, or integration of disparate data sources, leading to ineffective management and decision-making.

Innovation Solution

A system that integrates real-time data from various sources using direct, indirect, and remediation data pipes, sensors, and computer-readable instructions to calculate emissions and occupancy, generating facility action information for optimizing air quality and energy use through a layered feedback system, enabling predictive analytics and machine learning for improved campus management.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional building management systems are used, then device complexity is reduced, but measurement precision and data integration capability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveair quality measurement precisionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments data collection into multiple specialized data pipes (direct emission data pipe, indirect emission data pipe, remediation data pipe, sensor data pipe) that independently collect and transmit specific types of data to the server, allowing precise measurement without monolithic system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The server acts as an intermediary that receives, normalizes, and integrates data from multiple disparate sources including emission sources, remediation sources, and sensors, enabling precise air quality measurement without direct complex connections between all components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If real-time data processing is implemented, then productivity is improved, but use of energy increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereal-time data processing capabilityVSAvoidenergy consumption for data processing
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary data normalization and categorization at the server level before detailed analysis, preparing data in advance for efficient real-time processing and reducing the computational energy required during critical real-time operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system processes data at different levels of detail - using aggregated summaries for routine monitoring (lower energy) and full real-time processing only when anomalies or critical thresholds are detected (excessive action only when needed)

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Loss of information

If comprehensive data integration from disparate sources is achieved, then information completeness is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation completenessVSAvoiddata integration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The server provides universal data normalization and integration capabilities that work across multiple data types and sources (direct emissions, indirect emissions, remediation data, sensor data), eliminating the need for separate integration systems for each data category

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The server acts as a universal intermediary that standardizes data formats and protocols from disparate sources, enabling complete information integration without requiring complex point-to-point connections between all data sources

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Manufacturing precision

If layered feedback systems are implemented, then control precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol precisionVSAvoidfeedback system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The feedback system is segmented into multiple layers operating at different levels (building level, campus level, enterprise level), with each layer providing targeted control precision for its specific scope without requiring the entire system to be maximally complex

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20230126832A1Energy analysis and management platform using disparate data sources and layered feedback
Publication Date: 2023.04.27 CLEMSON UNIVERSITY
  • US20230126832A1 patent drawing
  • US20230126832A1 patent drawing
  • US20230126832A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for including a computer readable medium; data pipes a first emission source, second emission source, and remediation source, a remediation data pipe in communication with the server and a remediation source; a sensor; a facilities system in communications with a server; and, a set of computer readable instructions stored on the computer readable medium and configured to: receive first and second emission information, and remediation information, calculate an emission value, generate a facility action information according to a comparison of the enterprise emission value and a target emission value, and, transmit the facility action information to the facilities system wherein the facilities is configured to implement or reject an action represented by the facility action information.