Layered Flame-Proof Insulation for Transportation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional flame-resistant materials used in commercial transportation lack aesthetic appeal and comfort, failing to provide a visually pleasing and comfortable insulation solution while maintaining flame-proof properties.

Innovation Solution

A dual- or multi-layer insulation system comprising a UL 94 V-0 compliant, self-extinguishing, thermally and acoustically viable system with a contact layer, substrate layer, and foam layer, bonded using an adhesive and activator, and processed with specific tooling and press implanting pressure, heat, and time, which can include perforated vinyl or cloth and a fire-retardant PVC alloy sheet, enhancing both thermal and acoustical properties.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional flame-resistant materials (hard fiber insulation panels, cellulose fiber, foam products with foil layer) are used, then flame resistance is achieved, but aesthetic appeal and comfort are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflame resistanceVSAvoidaesthetic appeal
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a composite material structure consisting of multiple layers: a foam core layer (providing flame resistance and thermal insulation), a fabric layer (providing aesthetic appeal and comfort), and a foil layer (providing additional flame reflection and resistance). This composite structure integrates the advantages of different materials to simultaneously achieve flame resistance and aesthetic appeal, resolving the technical contradiction between reliability and ease of manufacture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Ease of manufacture

If multi-layer composite structure is implemented, then aesthetic appeal and comfort are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaesthetic appealVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The insulation material is segmented into distinct functional layers: a foam core layer for flame resistance and thermal insulation, a fabric layer for aesthetic appeal and comfort, and a foil layer for flame reflection. Each layer is independently manufactured and then bonded together, allowing for simplified production of individual layers while achieving complex overall functionality when assembled.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The multi-layer structure is designed so that each layer serves multiple functions. For example, the foam core layer provides both flame resistance and thermal insulation, while the fabric layer provides both aesthetic appeal and structural support. This multi-functionality reduces the need for additional specialized components, thereby managing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If flame-resistant materials are used, then safety is improved, but thermal and acoustical performance may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidthermal and acoustical performance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The composite structure combines a foam core layer (excellent thermal insulation properties), a foil layer (reflects thermal radiation and enhances flame resistance), and a fabric layer (provides acoustical absorption). This combination ensures that safety requirements are met while maintaining or enhancing thermal and acoustical performance, as each material contributes its strengths to the overall system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system achieves superior flame resistance, thermal conductivity, and acoustical absorption, meeting UL 94 V-0 standards, while offering aesthetic and functional benefits suitable for various transportation industries, including air, marine, and military applications.

Implementation Method 1

The layers are bonded via adhesive saturation with a bonding agent and activator

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdhesion: Adhesive

Implementation Method 2

The acoustical absorption ratios of the material are related to or determined by the design specified variable thickness of 'X'

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcoustic absorption: Acoustic Absorption

Implementation Method 3

The thermal conductivity 'R' value of the product with thickness of 1 inch or 25.4 mm equals that of 3.15 hr·ft2·F/Btu or better

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal insulation: Thermal Insulation

Implementation Method 4

A UL 94 V-0 compliant, flame-proof, self-extinguishing, thermal and acoustically viable vehicle insulation system

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlame resistance:

Data Source

PatentUS8846178B2Layered flame-proof material
Publication Date: 2014.09.30 CVG MANAGEMENT CORP
  • US8846178B2 patent drawing
  • US8846178B2 patent drawing
  • US8846178B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Materials or composites that can provide a complete finished product to the transportation industry that meets or exceeds fire resistant regulations and standards, e.g., the UL 94 V-0 Flame Test Standard are disclosed. These materials combine aesthetic and functional properties that are not apparent in other flame proof insulation materials available in the industry a whole.