Layered Network Routing for Adversarial Resiliency Planning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing communications networks lack efficient methods to identify and mitigate network weaknesses exploited by adversaries and optimize data routing to enhance resiliency against adversarial attacks, leading to potential disruptions and increased operational costs.

Innovation Solution

A prescriptive network resiliency model is employed to model the network as a directed graph, decompose it into layers with different communication priorities, and use a defender-attacker-defender (DAD) algorithm to determine optimal data routing, identify vulnerabilities, and recommend defensive measures, minimizing operational costs and disruptions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional network routing methods are used, then network operations continue with existing infrastructure, but network vulnerabilities remain exposed to adversarial attacks and operational costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork resiliencyVSAvoidmodel complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the network model into multiple layers (base layer, attack layer, defense layer) to systematically analyze and optimize routing decisions. This segmentation allows the complex resiliency problem to be broken down into manageable computational components while maintaining overall network reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary actions by pre-identifying vulnerable arcs through the attack layer analysis and pre-determining optimal defensive strategies before actual adversarial attacks occur. This proactive approach enhances network resiliency by preparing optimized routing paths in advance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If network redundancy is increased to improve resiliency, then more alternative paths are available for data routing, but operational costs and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork resiliencyVSAvoidoperational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes parameters by dynamically adjusting routing decisions based on layered analysis results, identifying critical arcs that require enhanced protection while reducing redundancy in less critical paths. This optimized parameter adjustment maintains necessary resiliency while minimizing operational costs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive network analysis is performed to identify all vulnerabilities, then network weaknesses are thoroughly identified, but computational time and processing resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevulnerability identification accuracyVSAvoidcomputational time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the vulnerability analysis into distinct layers (base network characteristics, potential attack vectors, defensive capabilities) that can be processed independently and efficiently. This segmentation enables comprehensive vulnerability identification without requiring exhaustive analysis of all possible attack scenarios simultaneously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by focusing computational resources on identifying and analyzing the most critical vulnerable arcs rather than attempting to equally analyze all network components. This approach achieves sufficient measurement precision for resiliency optimization while reducing overall computational time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12580943B2Systems and methods for network resiliency
Publication Date: 2026.03.17 KBR WYLE SERVICES LLC
  • US12580943B2 patent drawing
  • US12580943B2 patent drawing
  • US12580943B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method comprising defining a model that represents a communication network, wherein defining the model comprises: formulating a directed graph comprising nodes that represent communication data sources, communication data sinks, and communication data routers of at least a portion of the communication network and arcs connecting nodes that represent communication links between the communication data sources, communication data sinks, and communication data routers, defining a plurality of layers, each layer associated with a different set of communication priorities and comprising a replication of the directed graph, and assigning data communication attributes to the nodes and arcs of each layer, at least a portion of the data communication attributes being associated with different communication priorities; and determining an optimized set of communication flows through the model based on a minimization of communication cost.