Layered Bioresorbable Scaffold Implant for Tissue Integration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing implants for tissue reconstruction and regeneration, such as silicon-based implants and stem cell therapies, face issues with improper adhesion, discomfort, complications like fibrous capsule formation, and unsatisfactory aesthetic and structural outcomes, and fail to mimic the native tissue environment for optimal cell differentiation and vascularization.

Innovation Solution

A flexible, biodegradable scaffold implant with layered structures of varying resorption rates, designed to mimic native tissue properties, promoting cell adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation, and is patient-specific for improved structural support and tissue regeneration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If traditional silicon-based implants are used for tissue reconstruction, then structural support is provided, but adhesion to native tissue is poor and fibrous capsule formation occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural supportVSAvoidadhesion to native tissue
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The implant uses bioresorbable materials with controlled degradation rates that change over time, allowing the implant to transition from a rigid structural support to a gradually degrading scaffold that promotes tissue integration. The material composition and degradation kinetics are specifically tuned to match tissue regeneration rates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The implant employs composite structures combining different bioresorbable materials with varying degradation rates, creating a multi-phase material system that provides both initial structural support and progressive tissue adhesion. The composite nature allows simultaneous achievement of mechanical strength and biological compatibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Stability of the object's composition

If permanent implants are used for reconstruction, then structural stability is maintained, but patient comfort and aesthetic outcomes are unsatisfactory

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stabilityVSAvoidpatient discomfort
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The implant is designed as a temporary structure that provides structural stability during the critical tissue regeneration period, then gradually degrades and is replaced by native tissue. The bioresorbable nature ensures the implant is discarded after serving its purpose, eliminating long-term discomfort and aesthetic issues.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

Solution Approach 2:

The implant functions as a short-lived temporary scaffold that is intentionally designed to degrade within a specific timeframe. This disposable approach eliminates the need for permanent foreign bodies, improving patient comfort and aesthetic outcomes while maintaining structural stability when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Ease of manufacture

If homogeneous scaffold structures are used, then manufacturing is simplified, but tissue regeneration and vascularization are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescaffold fabricationVSAvoidtissue regeneration
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The scaffold is divided into multiple layers with different pore sizes, material compositions, and degradation rates. Each layer is optimized for specific functions: outer layers for tissue integration, inner layers for vascularization, and intermediate layers for structural support. This segmentation enables complex functionality while maintaining manufacturability through modular construction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the scaffold have locally optimized properties including varying pore sizes, material compositions, and degradation kinetics. The scaffold transitions from dense outer regions for structural support to more porous inner regions for vascularization, with each zone tailored to its specific biological function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Reliability

If rapidly degrading bioresorbable materials are used, then tissue integration is promoted, but structural support is lost before tissue maturation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetissue integrationVSAvoidstructural support
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The scaffold exhibits dynamic mechanical properties that evolve over time through controlled degradation. The material transitions from a rigid, high-strength structure to a more compliant, degrading scaffold, with the mechanical properties dynamically adapting to match the stage of tissue regeneration. This dynamic behavior ensures structural support is maintained when needed while promoting tissue integration as tissue matures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20250375287A1Scaffold based implants
Publication Date: 2025.12.11 MATERIALISE NV
  • US20250375287A1 patent drawing
  • US20250375287A1 patent drawing
  • US20250375287A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Certain aspects of the present disclosure provide a flexible scaffold implant comprising a plurality of layered structures, the plurality of layered structures comprising: a first layered structure having a three-dimensional (3D) shape and formed from a bioresorbable material, and a second layered structure conforming to the corresponding 3D shape of the first layered structure and formed from the bioresorbable material. The first layered structure is arranged in proximity to the second layered structure. The first layered structure is configured to dissolve for resorption at a different rate than the second layered structure based on design elements of the first layered structure and the second layered structure. The plurality of layered structures are flexible.