Layered Tooling with Electrodeposited Metallic Outer Layer

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current part fabrication methods, such as matched-metal tools, are expensive and time-consuming, while 3D printing and composite tools struggle with achieving high dimensional tolerances and require additional tooling, making them economically unfeasible for low-pressure applications.

Innovation Solution

A low-cost tooling method involving a layered structure with a non-solid-metal substrate, an intermediate layer for thermal expansion accommodation, and a metallic outer layer applied via electrodeposition, facilitating cost-effective and precise tool manufacturing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If matched-metal tools are used for part fabrication, then high dimensional tolerances and part quality are achieved, but tooling costs and manufacturing time increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedimensional tolerancesVSAvoidtooling costs
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The tool is divided into multiple functional layers: a substrate layer providing structural support, an intermediate layer managing thermal expansion and providing conductivity, and an outer layer defining the precision surface. This segmentation allows each layer to be optimized independently, achieving high dimensional tolerances without the cost of machining an entire metal tool.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The tool employs a composite structure combining different materials: a non-metallic substrate (such as composite or polymer), a metallic intermediate layer for thermal and electrical properties, and a precision outer layer. This composite approach provides the benefits of each material while avoiding the drawbacks of solid metal tools.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Reliability

If matched-metal tools are used for part fabrication, then durable and high-quality parts are produced, but extensive precision machining is required making the process time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepart qualityVSAvoidmanufacturing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The substrate and intermediate layers are prepared in advance through less time-consuming processes such as molding or casting, rather than requiring extensive precision machining. The precision outer layer is then applied to the pre-prepared substrate, significantly reducing total manufacturing time while maintaining part quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Only the outer layer requiring precision is machined or applied with high precision, while the bulk of the tool (substrate and intermediate layers) can be manufactured with lower precision requirements. This localized approach to quality reduces overall manufacturing time while maintaining where precision is critical.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Ease of manufacture

If 3D printing is used as a low-cost tooling option, then tooling costs are reduced and quick physical tools can be obtained, but dimensional tolerances are not yet fully understood and require highly specialized equipment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetooling costsVSAvoiddimensional tolerances
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The intermediate layer serves as a mediator between the 3D-printed or molded substrate and the precision outer layer. It compensates for dimensional variations in the substrate through thermal expansion properties and provides a conductive surface that facilitates precise electrodeposition of the outer layer, ensuring high dimensional tolerances are achieved.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The intermediate layer's thermal expansion properties are utilized to compensate for dimensional variations. By selecting materials with appropriate thermal expansion coefficients, the system can maintain dimensional tolerances across temperature variations, making the tooling process more robust and predictable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Ease of manufacture

If composite tools are used as a low-cost option, then tooling costs are reduced, but sufficiently high dimensional tolerances are not achieved and a separate tool is required increasing overall costs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetooling costsVSAvoiddimensional tolerances
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The substrate, intermediate layer, and outer layer are combined into a single integrated tool structure. The composite tool itself provides the precision surface through the outer layer, eliminating the need for a separate precision tool. This merging achieves both cost reduction and high dimensional tolerances in one tool.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The intermediate layer performs multiple functions: it provides thermal expansion compensation, ensures electrical conductivity for electrodeposition, and serves as a bonding interface between the substrate and outer layer. This multi-functionality reduces the need for additional components or separate tools.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces tooling costs and achieves high dimensional tolerances, enabling efficient and economical part fabrication suitable for low-pressure applications like composite molding.

Implementation Method 1

an intermediate layer positioned over the tool-side surface... to accommodate thermal expansion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal expansion: Thermal Expansion

Implementation Method 2

provide a conductive surface for electrodeposition of the outer metallic layer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrodeposition: Electrodeposition

Data Source

PatentUS10442116B2Low-cost tooling and method for manufacturing the same
Publication Date: 2019.10.15 THE BOEING CO
  • US10442116B2 patent drawing
  • US10442116B2 patent drawing
  • US10442116B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A tool including a tool body, the tool body including a substrate having a tool-side surface, an intermediate layer positioned over the tool-side surface, and an outer layer positioned over the intermediate layer, the outer layer including a metallic material.