Rolling Mill Laying Head Helical Support Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional laying heads in high-speed rod rolling mills face challenges with supporting the guide trough, leading to instability, misalignment, and wear issues, which compromise high-speed operation and increase weight, causing vibrations and material costs.

Innovation Solution

A continuous helical support integrated with the nose of the quill supports both the laying pipe and guide trough, with segmented and detachable side walls made of lightweight wear-resistant materials, reducing stress and allowing for easy replacement of worn parts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If a disc-shaped trough support with a heavy welded helical plate is used, then the guide trough can withstand high speed operational stresses, but the weight increases causing instability and vibrations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestrength of guide trough supportVSAvoidweight of laying head
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The guide trough is divided into multiple detachable segments that can be independently mounted on the helical support. This segmentation reduces the weight of individual components while maintaining overall structural strength, and allows for easier replacement of worn segments without replacing the entire trough assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The helical support structure is pre-formed as an integral part of the nose component during manufacturing, eliminating the need for separate welding operations and heavy assembly. This preliminary formation of the support structure reduces both weight and manufacturing complexity while maintaining strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If the trough support is made robust to withstand high speed stresses, then reliability improves, but manufacturing complexity and alignment difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of guide trough supportVSAvoidcomplexity of trough support structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The helical support structure is merged with the nose component as an integral part, eliminating separate alignment operations and reducing the number of components that require precise positioning. This integration maintains reliability while simplifying the overall structure and manufacturing process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The helical support structure serves multiple functions: it provides structural strength to withstand operational stresses, guides the laying pipe, and supports the detachable trough segments. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate components, simplifying the overall device while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of manufacture

If traditional investment castings are used for trough segments, then manufacturing is straightforward, but wear resistance is inadequate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of manufacturing trough segmentsVSAvoidwear resistance of trough segments
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The trough segments are constructed using composite materials or material combinations that provide both ease of manufacture and superior wear resistance. This may involve using wear-resistant alloys, coated materials, or composite structures that maintain manufacturability while significantly improving wear properties for high-speed operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Reliability

If the thickness of trough segment side walls is increased to improve wear resistance, then wear resistance improves, but weight increases contributing to instability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewear resistance of trough segmentsVSAvoidweight of guide trough
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Wear resistance is applied locally only where needed in the trough segments, such as on the inner surfaces that contact the rod product, rather than uniformly increasing the thickness of all walls. This localized approach provides necessary wear resistance while minimizing weight increase and maintaining structural efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS10293390B2Rolling mill laying head
Publication Date: 2019.05.21 PRIMETALS TECHNOLOGIES USA LLC
  • US10293390B2 patent drawing
  • US10293390B2 patent drawing
  • US10293390B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A laying head for forming an axially moving hot rolled product into a helical series of rings includes a quill rotatable about an axis, with a tubular body journaled for rotation between axially spaced bearings, and a nose projecting axially and forwardly from its tubular body. A product guide is carried by the quill. The product guide is configured to form the product into a helical series of rings. A guide trough provides a helical extension of the product guide. Major portions of the product guide and the guide trough are carried on a continuous helical support on the nose of the quill. The guide trough is channel shaped, with a continuous bottom defining the rim of the helical support, and with segmented detachable side walls.