Layout Pattern Selective Amendment for Semiconductor Accuracy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for transferring layout patterns in semiconductor manufacturing, such as photolithography, often result in deviations due to pattern characteristics, wafer topology, and process parameters, leading to inaccuracies in integrated circuit formation.

Innovation Solution

A method that classifies layout patterns into distinct groups, allowing for selective simulation and amendment procedures tailored to each group's specific attributes, enhancing the accuracy and speed of optical proximity correction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If traditional optical proximity correction is applied to all layout patterns uniformly, then correction coverage is complete, but processing time and computational resources increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelayout pattern accuracyVSAvoidcorrection processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments layout patterns into multiple groups based on their characteristics (e.g., pitch, density, shape complexity). Different groups receive different correction treatments, allowing critical patterns to be corrected with high precision while less critical patterns use simplified correction methods, thereby reducing overall processing time while maintaining necessary accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different correction qualities to different regions of the layout pattern. Critical areas that require high precision receive full optical proximity correction, while non-critical areas use simplified correction or no correction at all. This local differentiation optimizes the balance between accuracy and processing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If uniform correction procedures are applied to all layout patterns, then consistency is maintained, but processing efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecorrection consistencyVSAvoidpattern correction speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides layout patterns into groups based on their characteristics and applies different correction procedures to each group. This segmentation allows the system to maintain consistency within each group while improving overall processing efficiency by avoiding unnecessary uniform correction across all patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes correction parameters (such as correction amount, algorithm complexity, or correction applied) based on the specific group characteristics. By adjusting these parameters dynamically according to pattern requirements, the system maintains reliability for critical patterns while enhancing productivity for less critical ones.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If detailed simulation and amendment procedures are performed on all layout pattern members, then correction accuracy is maximized, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecorrection accuracyVSAvoidprocessing system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments layout patterns into groups and applies different levels of simulation and amendment procedures to each group. Critical patterns receive detailed simulation and amendment to maximize accuracy, while less critical patterns use simplified procedures, thereby reducing overall computational complexity while maintaining necessary accuracy levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial correction action to certain pattern groups rather than exhaustive correction to all patterns. By performing detailed simulation and amendment only where necessary (partial action), the system achieves sufficient correction accuracy without the excessive computational complexity of applying full correction universally.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS8042069B2Method for selectively amending layout patterns
Publication Date: 2011.10.18 UNITED MICROELECTRONICS CORP
  • US8042069B2 patent drawing
  • US8042069B2 patent drawing
  • US8042069B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method to selectively amend a layout pattern is disclosed. First, a layout pattern including at least a first group and a second group is provided, wherein each one of the first group and the second group respectively includes multiple members. Second, a simulation procedure and an amendment procedure are respectively performed on all the members of the first group and the second group to obtain an amended first group and an amended second group. Then, the amended first group and the amended second group are verified as being on target or not. Afterwards, the layout pattern including the on target amended first group and the on target amended second group is output.