Lattice Boltzmann Solver Total Energy Conservation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current Lattice Boltzmann Method (LBM) solvers face challenges in conserving total energy and maintaining stability, especially in high-speed flows and complex boundary conditions, leading to inaccuracies in pressure convection and energy conservation.

Innovation Solution

The method involves simulating fluid flow using a LBM approach with a second distribution function for total energy, where specific total energy values are added to advected states and subtracted from non-advected states, ensuring energy conservation and stability by modifying state vectors and introducing a regularized collision operator for energy conservation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a single distribution function is used to solve mass, momentum and total energy, then the conservation of these quantities can be satisfied, but the lattice stencil size increases and more lattice velocities are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconservation of mass, momentum and total energyVSAvoidlattice stencil size and number of lattice velocities
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the single distribution function into two separate distribution functions: one for solving mass and momentum conservation, and another for solving total energy conservation. This segmentation allows each distribution function to use a smaller lattice stencil and fewer lattice velocities, reducing computational complexity while maintaining conservation properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary approach where the two distribution functions are coupled through a source term that ensures consistency between mass-momentum and energy conservation. This intermediary mechanism allows the separate functions to work together to achieve overall conservation without requiring a single complex distribution function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If conventional LBM solvers are used, then computational efficiency is maintained, but total energy conservation and stability are compromised, especially in high-speed flows

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational efficiencyVSAvoidtotal energy conservation and stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent modifies the LBM formulation by changing the parameter representation from a single distribution function to two distribution functions with different lattice velocity sets. This parameter change enables the system to maintain computational efficiency while achieving better energy conservation and stability, particularly for high-speed flows where conventional solvers fail.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dynamic coupling between the two distribution functions through a source term that adjusts based on the flow conditions. This dynamic mechanism allows the solver to adapt to different flow regimes, maintaining stability and energy conservation in high-speed flows while preserving computational efficiency across various scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Measurement precision

If the number of lattice velocities is increased to satisfy higher moment requirements, then conservation accuracy improves, but computational cost and stencil size increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconservation accuracyVSAvoidcomputational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the moment requirements between two distribution functions, allowing each function to use a smaller set of lattice velocities appropriate for its specific conservation role. This segmentation achieves the necessary conservation accuracy without requiring all particles to satisfy high-order moment requirements, thereby reducing computational cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances the stability range of the LBM solver, accurately conserving total energy and providing correct pressure gradients, even in high-speed flows and complex scenarios, improving the accuracy of fluid flow simulations.

Implementation Method 1

The advection process involves modeling movement of particles from one location to another according to the particles microscopic velocities

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdvection: Advection

Implementation Method 2

The collision process involves interactions among particles obeying conservation laws

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConservation of Momentum: Conservation of Momentum

Data Source

PatentUS12079552B2Lattice Boltzmann solver enforcing total energy conservation
Publication Date: 2024.09.03 DASSAULT SYSTEMS AMERICAS CORP
  • US12079552B2 patent drawing
  • US12079552B2 patent drawing
  • US12079552B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques for simulating fluid flow using a lattice Boltzmann (LB) approach for solving scalar transport equations and solving for total energy are described. In addition to the lattice Boltzmann functions for fluid flow the techniques include modifying a set of state vectors of the particles by adding specific total energy to states of particles that will be advected and subtracting the specific total energy from states of particles that will not be advected over a time interval and performing advection of the particles according to the modified set of states.