LBT Mode Indication in Synchronization Signals for Shared Spectrum

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current wireless communication systems face challenges in system acquisition in shared radio frequency spectrum bands, particularly in unlicensed bands, where base stations may operate in different Listen Before Talk (LBT) modes, leading to inefficiencies in channel access and data transmission due to varying LBT modes and congestion levels.

Innovation Solution

The described techniques involve a base station transmitting an indication of its LBT mode to user equipment (UE), allowing the UE to determine a Physical Broadcast Channel (PBCH) configuration based on this indication, enabling efficient reception of PBCH transmissions and adaptive re-synchronization during LBT mode switches.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If base stations operate in different LBT modes in shared spectrum bands, then channel access flexibility is improved, but system acquisition efficiency deteriorates due to varying transmission patterns

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechannel access flexibilityVSAvoidsystem acquisition efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The base station performs preliminary action by transmitting the LBT mode indication in the synchronization signal before the UE needs to acquire the system. This allows the UE to prepare the appropriate PBCH reception configuration in advance, eliminating the need for trial-and-error acquisition and improving system acquisition efficiency while maintaining channel access flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The synchronization signal provides feedback information about the base station's LBT mode to the UE. This feedback mechanism enables the UE to adapt its PBCH reception parameters accordingly, resolving the contradiction between maintaining operational flexibility and ensuring efficient system acquisition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If base stations transmit PBCH according to fixed configuration, then reception simplicity is improved, but adaptability to different LBT modes deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereception simplicityVSAvoidadaptability to LBT modes
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from a fixed PBCH reception configuration to a dynamic one where the UE adjusts its reception parameters based on the LBT mode indication received in the synchronization signal. This dynamic adaptation maintains reception simplicity for each specific mode while providing overall adaptability across different LBT modes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The UE changes its PBCH reception parameters (such as expected transmission periodicity and timing) based on the LBT mode indication. This parameter adaptation allows the UE to maintain simple reception procedures for each mode while adapting to different operational conditions, resolving the contradiction between simplicity and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If UEs perform system acquisition without LBT mode information, then acquisition procedure simplicity is improved, but transmission reliability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveacquisition procedure complexityVSAvoiddata transmission reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The LBT mode indication is merged with the synchronization signal transmission, which is already a mandatory part of system acquisition. This combining approach adds the reliability benefit of LBT mode awareness without increasing acquisition procedure complexity, as the UE processes both pieces of information simultaneously during the standard acquisition flow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The synchronization signal acts as an intermediary that carries both the cell identification information and the LBT mode indication. This intermediary mechanism delivers the reliability-enhancing LBT mode information through an existing, simple acquisition procedure, avoiding the need for separate complex signaling mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS10687359B2System acquisition in a shared radio frequency spectrum band
Publication Date: 2020.06.16 QUALCOMM INC
  • US10687359B2 patent drawing
  • US10687359B2 patent drawing
  • US10687359B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and devices for wireless communications are described. In some wireless systems utilizing shared radio frequency spectrum bands, base stations may operate in different listen before talk (LBT) modes. For example, a base station may operate in an LBT enabled mode or a non-LBT enabled mode. A UE may perform system acquisition with the base station based on receiving acquisition signals (e.g., synchronization signals and physical broadcast channel (PBCH) signals) from the base station. These acquisition signals may depend on the LBT mode of the base station. For example, the frame timing and number of subframes for the acquisition signals may be based on the LBT mode of the base station. In some cases, a base station may adaptively switch LBT modes, and the UE may re-synchronize with the base station based on an LBT configuration period or a paging message from the base station.