LBT Contention Window Adjustment Using HARQ Feedback in NR-U

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

There is a need for improved techniques to adjust the contention window in unlicensed New Radio (NR) wireless communication systems to enhance spectral efficiency and manage hybrid automatic repeat request (HARQ) feedback effectively.

Innovation Solution

The method involves adjusting the size of the listen before talk (LBT) contention window based on HARQ feedback, such as setting or increasing it based on ACK or NACK, determining the duration of the HARQ feedback window, and selectively restarting the LBT procedure based on timing thresholds and channel access priorities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the LBT contention window size is increased to reduce collisions in unlicensed spectrum, then collision probability decreases, but transmission latency increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision probabilityVSAvoidtransmission latency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The LBT contention window size is made dynamic by adjusting it based on HARQ feedback timing. When HARQ feedback is received within the expected timing window, the contention window is reset to minimum size enabling rapid retransmission. When feedback timing deviates, the window size is adjusted accordingly. This dynamic adaptation resolves the contradiction by allowing small window sizes (low latency) when conditions permit, and larger sizes (high reliability) when collision risk increases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses HARQ feedback as a control mechanism to adjust contention window size. The feedback timing serves as an indicator of channel conditions and collision risk. By continuously monitoring feedback timing and adjusting the contention window accordingly, the system achieves adaptive collision avoidance without fixed conservative parameters, thus balancing reliability and latency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Loss of time

If the LBT contention window size is decreased to reduce transmission latency, then transmission speed increases, but collision probability increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransmission latencyVSAvoidcollision probability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The contention window size transitions from static to dynamic control. Instead of using a fixed small window size that causes collisions, the system adapts the window size based on real-time HARQ feedback timing. This allows the system to maintain small window sizes (low latency) only when feedback timing indicates low collision risk, while automatically increasing the window when timing deviations suggest higher collision probability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the key parameter of contention window size based on HARQ feedback timing characteristics. When feedback is received within the expected time window, the parameter is set to minimum for low latency. When timing deviations occur, the parameter is increased to reduce collisions. This parameter adaptation resolves the contradiction between latency and collision probability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Stability of the object's composition

If HARQ feedback timing is strictly enforced to maintain protocol synchronization, then system synchronization is improved, but flexibility in handling feedback delays is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotocol synchronizationVSAvoidflexibility in handling feedback delays
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts contention window size based on actual HARQ feedback timing rather than strictly enforcing predetermined timing. This allows the system to maintain synchronization through adaptive parameter changes rather than rigid timing constraints, achieving both synchronization stability and flexibility in handling timing variations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of maintaining fixed timing parameters, the system changes the contention window size parameter in response to actual feedback timing. This parameter adaptation allows the system to accommodate feedback delays while maintaining effective synchronization, resolving the contradiction between strict timing enforcement and flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Productivity

If the LBT procedure is restarted based on HARQ feedback to improve uplink communication efficiency, then spectral efficiency is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespectral efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses HARQ feedback as a trigger for LBT procedure restart and contention window adjustment. This feedback-driven approach enables efficient spectral utilization by restarting LBT when feedback indicates available resources, while avoiding unnecessary complexity through rule-based decision logic rather than complex algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The UE autonomously determines whether to restart LBT and adjust contention window size based on HARQ feedback timing without requiring complex network coordination. This self-service mechanism improves spectral efficiency through local adaptive decisions while minimizing system complexity by avoiding centralized control overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12537633B2Techniques for adjusting contention window in unlicensed new radio
Publication Date: 2026.01.27 QUALCOMM INC
  • US12537633B2 patent drawing
  • US12537633B2 patent drawing
  • US12537633B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Various aspects of the present disclosure generally relate to wireless communication. In some aspects, a user equipment (UE) may transmit an uplink communication, associated with a reference duration, in an uplink burst. The UE may receive hybrid automatic repeat request (HARQ) feedback after transmitting the uplink communication. The UE may adjust a size of a listen before talk (LBT) contention window based at least in part on whether the HARQ feedback is associated with the reference duration. Numerous other aspects are provided.