LC Composite Resonator Layout for Compact High-Q Coil Coupling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing multilayer bandpass filters with helical coils have increased surface-direction size and suboptimal coupling due to side-by-side arrangement of coil electrodes, limiting size reduction and coupling flexibility while maintaining a high Q-value for resonators.

Innovation Solution

The configuration includes two helical inductors with overlapping arrangements and shared closed magnetic circuits, reducing the occupied area and increasing mutual inductance, while minimizing parasitic capacitance by arranging electrodes with small potential differences and using a ground electrode to stabilize inductance and prevent unnecessary magnetic coupling.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If two coil electrodes are arranged side by side in a multilayer bandpass filter, then the coupling between coils can be increased by decreasing the horizontal distance, but the surface-direction size of the multilayer substrate undesirably increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoupling between coilsVSAvoidsurface-direction size
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from a two-dimensional side-by-side arrangement to a three-dimensional overlapping arrangement where helical coils are positioned at different heights (z-axis) and overlap when viewed from the top. This vertical stacking approach enables strong magnetic coupling through shared magnetic flux paths while minimizing the horizontal footprint of the device.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements nested positioning where one helical coil is placed within the projection area of another coil when viewed from above, creating an overlapping configuration. This nesting strategy allows the coils to occupy the same planar space at different vertical levels, achieving compact size reduction while maintaining coupling efficiency through magnetic field interaction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Area of stationary object

If two coil electrodes are arranged side by side, then the surface-direction size is reduced, but coupling as strong as that obtained by arranging the coil electrodes to touch each other may not be obtained

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface-direction sizeVSAvoidcoupling strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

By utilizing the vertical dimension for coil placement, the patent achieves strong coupling without requiring the coils to touch or be in close horizontal proximity. The overlapping arrangement at different heights creates effective magnetic coupling through shared flux paths while maintaining a larger horizontal separation for compact packaging.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces the dielectric layers and magnetic flux as intermediaries that facilitate coupling between the overlapping helical coils. The magnetic field acts as a mediator that transfers energy between coils separated in space, enabling strong coupling without direct physical contact or minimal horizontal separation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Area of stationary object

If the occupied area is reduced by overlapping arrangement, then the entire size is reduced, but the Q-value of resonators may decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoccupied areaVSAvoidQ-value of resonator
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality optimization by carefully designing the overlapping region of the helical coils to maintain appropriate spacing and geometric characteristics that preserve Q-value. The local arrangement of conductors and dielectric materials in the overlapping area is optimized to minimize losses while achieving compact size, ensuring that the resonator quality factor remains high despite the reduced overall footprint.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration reduces the overall size of the resonator while maintaining a high Q-value, broadening the settable range of coupling and improving design flexibility by enhancing mutual inductance and suppressing parasitic capacitance.

Implementation Method 1

The two neighboring coil electrodes are coupled through a magnetic field

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic field coupling: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

mutual inductance is increased

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMutual inductance: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 3

closed magnetic circuits of the two inductors are shared

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectClosed magnetic circuit: Magnetic Field

Implementation Method 4

parasitic capacitance between the line electrodes of the helical electrodes can be suppressed and minimized

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectParasitic capacitance: Parasitic Capacitance

Data Source

PatentUS8026778B2LC composite component
Publication Date: 2011.09.27 MURATA MFG CO LTD
  • US8026778B2 patent drawing
  • US8026778B2 patent drawing
  • US8026778B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An LC composite component capable of reducing an overall size while keeping a Q-value of a resonator at a high level and increasing coupling flexibility of resonators includes two capacitor electrodes and two input/output terminal electrodes extending therefrom provided on a first dielectric layer. A ground electrode and another capacitor electrode are provided on second and sixth dielectric layers, respectively. Two substantially linear line electrodes are provided on a third dielectric layer. Two substantially U-shaped line electrodes are provided on a fourth dielectric layer. Two substantially crank-shaped line electrodes are provided on a fifth dielectric layer. Six via electrodes arranged to connect ends of respective line electrodes are provided on the third, fourth, and fifth dielectric layers. These via electrodes and line electrodes constitute electrodes of a double helix structure.