LC/MS/MS PFAS Detection Without Extraction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for determining low levels of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in water sources require time-consuming and costly extraction steps, which can introduce errors and contamination, limiting the effectiveness of qualitative and quantitative analysis.

Innovation Solution

A method and system utilizing liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) with electrospray ionization (ESI) to detect PFAS analytes directly in unconcentrated samples, eliminating the need for extraction by applying specific ESI conditions such as probe gas temperature, sheath gas heater settings, and gas flow rates to accurately determine concentrations and amounts of PFAS analytes in water samples.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If extraction steps are used to determine low levels of PFAS in water sources, then detection sensitivity is improved, but analysis time increases and contamination risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection sensitivityVSAvoidanalysis time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies extraction in reverse by eliminating the traditional extraction step entirely. Instead of extracting PFAS from water samples using solid-phase extraction or liquid-liquid extraction, the method directly analyzes unconcentrated water samples using LC/MS/MS with optimized ESI conditions, thereby reducing analysis time while maintaining detection sensitivity through direct injection analysis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Measurement precision

If extraction steps are used to determine low levels of PFAS in water sources, then detection sensitivity is improved, but risk of errors and contamination increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection sensitivityVSAvoidcontamination risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent eliminates the extraction step that introduces contamination risks. By using direct injection of unconcentrated samples into the LC/MS/MS system with optimized electrospray ionization conditions, the method avoids contact with extraction solvents, silica gel, and other materials that could introduce contaminants or cause sample loss

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates an inert analysis environment by using volatile buffers and optimizing ESI conditions that minimize sample degradation and contamination. The direct analysis approach reduces the number of interfaces where contamination could occur, effectively creating a cleaner analysis pathway

Inventive Principle:
Principle #39Inert atmosphere (Inert environment)

3Measurement precision

If extraction steps are used to concentrate PFAS samples, then detection limit is improved, but cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection limitVSAvoidanalysis cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the extraction step that incurs costs for consumables like extraction cartridges, solvents, and additional processing materials. By directly analyzing unconcentrated samples with optimized LC/MS/MS methods, the approach reduces per-sample costs while achieving comparable or better detection limits through improved instrument sensitivity and reduced matrix effects

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Device complexity

If traditional LC/MS/MS methods are used without optimized ESI conditions, then instrument complexity is reduced, but detection sensitivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstrument simplicityVSAvoiddetection sensitivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes detection sensitivity by systematically adjusting ESI parameters including capillary voltage, gas flow rates, and temperature settings. These parameter optimizations enhance ionization efficiency and signal intensity without requiring modifications to the instrument hardware, thereby maintaining simplicity while improving performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables accurate and efficient detection of PFAS analytes at low concentrations without extraction, reducing costs and errors, and allowing for direct analysis of unconcentrated samples like finished drinking water and ground water, improving the reliability of PFAS analysis in water sources.

Implementation Method 1

the LC/MS/MS includes electrospray ionization (ESI)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrospray ionization: Electrostatics

Implementation Method 2

a probe gas temperature of approximately 120° C. to approximately 180° C., ii) a sheath gas heater setting of approximately 250° C. to approximately 400° C.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEvaporation: Evaporation

Data Source

PatentUS11860140B2Determination of concentrations and amounts of perfluoroalkyl substances by LC/MS/MS
Publication Date: 2024.01.02 SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY
  • US11860140B2 patent drawing
  • US11860140B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and system for injecting an unconcentrated sample into a receiving LC/MS/MS system that is configured to determine a concentration of one or more PFAS analytes within the unconcentrated sample, wherein the LC/MS/MS includes ESI. The unconcentrated sample may be subjected to one or more of the following ESI conditions: i) a probe gas temperature of approximately 120° C. to approximately 180° C.; ii) a sheath gas heater setting of approximately 250° C. to approximately 400° C.; and/or iii) a sheath gas flow of approximately 8 L/min to approximately 12 L/min. The unconcentrated sample's concentration and/or an injected amount of the one or more PFAS analytes is determined.