LCOS Optical Beam Routing with Wavefront Error Compensation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing LCOS-based optical switches face issues with insertion loss and crosstalk due to limitations in fabricating perfect SLMs and displaying ideal phase patterns, leading to significant power being diffracted into unwanted diffraction orders.

Innovation Solution

Introducing a wavefront error, such as defocus, into the optical system and correcting for it with an optimized kinoform displayed on the SLM, which reduces coupling of unwanted diffraction orders into other optical outputs by aberrating non-selected orders.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If traditional grating patterns are used in LCOS-based optical switches, then the device structure is simple and easy to manufacture, but significant power is diffracted into unwanted diffraction orders causing high insertion loss and crosstalk

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveSLM fabrication simplicityVSAvoidinsertion loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by modifying the phase pattern parameters displayed on the SLM. Specifically, it uses optimized phase patterns such as blazed gratings with specific duty cycles (e.g., 50%) and phase depths (e.g., π or 2π) to control diffraction efficiency. The patent also employs iterative algorithms like Gerchberg-Saxton to calculate optimal phase patterns that maximize coupling into desired output fibers while minimizing unwanted diffraction orders, thereby reducing insertion loss without changing the physical SLM structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements preliminary action by pre-calculating and storing optimized phase patterns in a lookup table before operation. The system pre-computes the ideal phase patterns using iterative algorithms that account for the specific optical geometry, fiber positions, and wavelength parameters. During switching operations, the system simply retrieves and displays the pre-optimized pattern corresponding to the desired input-output connection, eliminating the need for real-time calculation and ensuring optimal performance is achieved before the optical beam is routed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Device complexity

If traditional grating patterns are used in LCOS-based optical switches, then the device structure is simple, but significant power is diffracted into unwanted diffraction orders causing high crosstalk

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptical system structureVSAvoidcrosstalk
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent reduces crosstalk by changing the phase pattern parameters displayed on the SLM. It uses blazed grating patterns with specific spatial frequencies and phase modulations that concentrate diffracted power into the desired first-order maximum while suppressing higher-order diffraction. The patent also employs iterative optimization algorithms to calculate phase patterns that account for the specific geometry of the optical system, ensuring that unwanted diffraction orders do not couple into adjacent output fibers, thereby minimizing crosstalk without adding physical complexity to the optical train.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the potentially harmful effect of diffraction into a beneficial phenomenon by using blazed grating patterns that deliberately shape the diffraction pattern. Instead of trying to eliminate diffraction, the patent harnesses it by designing phase patterns that steer the primary diffraction order precisely to the desired output fiber while pushing unwanted orders away from active fibers. This approach transforms diffraction from a source of crosstalk into a mechanism for precise beam steering and power concentration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Loss of energy

If perfect SLM fabrication and ideal phase patterns are achieved, then insertion loss and crosstalk are minimized, but manufacturing precision and fabrication difficulty increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower lossVSAvoidSLM fabrication precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent addresses manufacturing limitations by changing the approach from requiring perfect physical SLM fabrication to optimizing software-controlled phase parameters. It uses iterative algorithms like Gerchberg-Saxton that can compensate for non-ideal SLM characteristics by calculating phase patterns that work around manufacturing imperfections. The system adjusts phase depth, spatial frequency, and duty cycle parameters to achieve optimal performance with commercially available SLMs that have typical pixelation and response characteristics, rather than requiring ultra-precise fabrication.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback through iterative optimization algorithms that calculate phase patterns based on measured or specified system performance requirements. The Gerchberg-Saxton algorithm and similar methods iteratively refine the phase pattern by comparing the desired output field distribution with the actual result, adjusting the phase parameters to minimize errors. This feedback loop allows the system to achieve low insertion loss and crosstalk by software optimization rather than requiring perfect hardware fabrication, continuously adapting the phase pattern to compensate for SLM imperfections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach effectively reduces crosstalk and increases the efficiency of light coupling into the intended output fibers, improving the overall performance of LCOS-based optical switches by minimizing power loss and noise.

Implementation Method 1

a diffracted beam is generated which has a zeroth diffraction order and a first diffraction order

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDiffraction: Diffraction

Implementation Method 2

routing an optical beam from an input optical fibre to a selected output optical fibre using holographic techniques

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHolography:

Data Source

PatentEP2686731B1Optical beam routing apparatus and method of routing an optical beam
Publication Date: 2020.06.24 CAMBRIDGE ENTERPRISE LTD
  • EP2686731B1 patent drawingFigure 1a~1b
  • EP2686731B1 patent drawingFigure 1c
  • EP2686731B1 patent drawingFigure 2a~3

AI summary

This invention relates to methods and apparatus for routing light beams in telecommunications devices using holographic techniques, in particular by displaying kinoforms on LCOS (Liquid Crystal on Silicon) devices. Thus we describe optical beam routing apparatus comprising: at least one optical input to receive an input beam; a plurality of optical outputs; a spatial light modulator (SLM) on an optical path between said optical input and said optical outputs; and a driver for said SLM to display a kinoform on said SLM to diffract said input beam into an output beam comprising a plurality of diffraction orders, wherein a routed one of said diffraction orders is directed to at least one selected said optical output; wherein said apparatus is configured to modify a wavefront of said output beam to reduce a coupling of said output beam into said selected optical output; and wherein said kinoform is adapted to compensate for said wavefront modification to compensate for said reduced coupling and thereby to reduce a coupling of other diffracted light from said input beam into others of said optical outputs than said at least one selected optical output.