LCP Procedure with Inter-UE Coordination for Sidelink

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In wireless communication networks, the current Logical Channel Prioritization (LCP) procedure often selects a different destination for sidelink transmission than intended by the physical layer during sensing/resource selection, leading to inefficiencies and the need for redundant resource selection processes.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a method where the Medium Access Control (MAC) layer sets the destination for sidelink transmissions based on Inter-User Equipment (UE) coordination information, skipping the initial destination selection step and using the destination ID indicated by the physical layer, and managing latency bounds for Inter-UE coordination reports to ensure timely and accurate resource allocation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the MAC layer selects destination based on highest logical channel priority during LCP procedure, then the destination selection follows standard priority rules, but it may select a different destination than the one whose IUC information was used during PHY sensing/resource selection

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedestination selection consistencyVSAvoidcoordination between MAC and PHY layers
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The PHY layer performs sensing and resource selection in advance, identifying the intended destination before the MAC layer performs LCP. The PHY layer provides the intended destination ID to the MAC layer prior to destination selection, allowing the MAC layer to align its destination choice with the PHY layer's pre-selected destination, ensuring consistency between layers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The PHY layer feeds back the intended destination ID information to the MAC layer after completing sensing and resource selection. This feedback mechanism allows the MAC layer to receive information about which destination the PHY layer intends to use, enabling the MAC layer to adjust its destination selection to match the PHY layer's choice, thereby ensuring consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If the MAC layer uses candidate resources provided by PHY for SL transmission, then resource allocation is optimized based on PHY sensing, but the destination may not match the destination whose IUC information was considered

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource utilization efficiencyVSAvoiddestination alignment information
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The PHY layer determines the intended destination and selects candidate resources in advance before MAC layer processing. By providing both the candidate resources and the intended destination ID to the MAC layer beforehand, the MAC layer can use the pre-selected resources while ensuring the transmission is directed to the correct destination, preventing loss of destination alignment information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The PHY layer provides feedback to the MAC layer indicating which destination's IUC information was used during resource selection. This feedback ensures that the MAC layer has the necessary destination alignment information to correctly associate the candidate resources with the intended destination, preventing information loss about destination correspondence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If the LCP procedure selects a different destination than PHY intended, then MAC follows its own selection criteria, but redundant resource selection processes are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveindependence of MAC layer selectionVSAvoidredundant processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The PHY layer performs preliminary sensing and resource selection, identifying both candidate resources and the intended destination. By providing this information to the MAC layer in advance, the MAC layer can directly use the pre-determined destination without needing to perform redundant destination selection, eliminating wasteful re-processing while maintaining operational independence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The PHY layer feeds back the intended destination ID to the MAC layer, allowing the MAC layer to verify and adopt the PHY layer's destination selection. This feedback mechanism enables the MAC layer to skip redundant destination selection processes and directly proceed with transmission using the aligned destination, reducing processing time while maintaining ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20240430913A1LCP procedure considering inter-UE coordination schemes
Publication Date: 2024.12.26 LENOVO (SINGAPORE) PTE LTD
  • US20240430913A1 patent drawing
  • US20240430913A1 patent drawing
  • US20240430913A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Apparatuses, methods, and systems are disclosed for LCP procedure considering IUC schemes. An apparatus (600) includes a memory (610) and a processor (605) coupled to the memory (610). The processor (605) is configured to cause the apparatus (600) to determine a latency bound for transmission of a SL inter-UE coordination report via a MAC CE, maintain a report timer for transmitting the inter-UE coordination report via the MAC CE according to the determined latency bound, and transmit the inter-UE coordination information via the MAC CE based on the report timer.