LDA Topic Modeling for Software Help Document Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for identifying user experience issues in software systems are costly and inefficient, particularly in complex systems where manual tagging and summarization of help documents lead to misleading statistics due to inconsistent annotations and unequal tag weights.

Innovation Solution

The use of Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) algorithm for topic modeling in help documentation, combined with context-sensitive help systems and data tracking, to automatically cluster and analyze user access patterns, providing meaningful statistics on user experience issues without requiring costly user interactions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual tagging and summarization of help documents is used, then user experience issues can be identified, but the process becomes costly and inefficient with misleading statistics

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of user experience issue identificationVSAvoidefficiency of help document analysis
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical tagging and summarization processes with automated text mining and natural language processing algorithms. The system automatically extracts topics, concepts, and user experience issues from help documents without human intervention, eliminating the inefficiencies and inconsistencies of manual annotation while maintaining or improving measurement accuracy through systematic computational analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates automated copies of the manual analysis process through computational models. Instead of relying on human experts to manually tag documents, the system uses trained algorithms that replicate and scale the analysis function, producing consistent results across large volumes of help documentation without the diminishing returns that plague manual processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Measurement precision

If manual tagging of help documents is performed, then topics can be identified, but inconsistent annotations and unequal tag weights lead to misleading statistics

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconsistency of topic identificationVSAvoidreliability of help access statistics
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the analysis from discrete manual tagging to continuous computational topic modeling. Instead of assigning fixed tags with equal weight, the system uses algorithms that calculate topic prevalence as continuous values based on text frequency, distribution patterns, and contextual relationships. This parameter transformation eliminates the arbitrary nature of manual tag assignment and produces more reliable, nuanced statistics about help document content and user access patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If extensive user feedback is collected to identify user experience issues, then accurate insights can be obtained, but the process requires significant time and effort from users and product teams

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of user experience insightsVSAvoidtime required for user feedback collection
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary analysis of help documents before users actually use the software. By pre-extracting topics, concepts, and potential user experience issues from the help documentation itself, the system creates a framework that can automatically correlate with actual user behavior data. This eliminates the need to wait for and manually analyze extensive user feedback, as the system proactively identifies and monitors user experience issues in real-time based on pre-processed help document analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10223137B2Data processing
Publication Date: 2019.03.05 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US10223137B2 patent drawing
  • US10223137B2 patent drawing
  • US10223137B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of identifying topics which a user requires help with when using a software program is described. For each of a plurality of help documents, the help document is associated with a set of topics and their relative prevalence within the help document. User access to the help documents is tracked during use of the software program. Topics in relation to which help was required during use of the software program are identified based on an amount of access to one or more of the help documents and the relative prevalence of topics within the accessed help documents.