Search Template Analysis for LDAP Performance Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

LDAP server vendors lack direct assistance in determining which search attributes to index for optimal search performance, leading to inefficient data retrieval due to large data storage needs and high human intervention in logging performance data.

Innovation Solution

A method for statistically tracking search performance by correlating search requests to templates, calculating time parameters, and automatically updating and sorting statistical records to identify efficient search templates, reducing the need for manual intervention and optimizing search efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If logging features are implemented to record performance data on each individual search, then search performance can be analyzed, but large amounts of data storage are needed and time is lost for logging performance data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesearch performance analysisVSAvoiddata storage
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential performance metrics (search time, template identification) from the logging process, storing only what is necessary for performance analysis rather than logging complete search data. This reduces data storage requirements while maintaining the ability to analyze search performance patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-identifies and caches search template patterns before performance analysis is needed. By having templates预先 prepared and indexed, the system can quickly match incoming searches to templates without extensive logging and analysis of raw search data, reducing both storage needs and analysis time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If logging features are implemented to record performance data on each individual search, then search performance can be analyzed, but high level of human intervention is required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesearch performance analysisVSAvoidhuman intervention
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically performs template identification, performance metric calculation, and analysis without requiring human intervention. The server autonomously monitors search performance, identifies slow search templates, and generates recommendations, eliminating the need for administrators to manually scan logs and analyze performance data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements automated feedback loops where performance data is continuously collected, analyzed, and used to generate actionable insights. This closed-loop system automatically adjusts and recommends optimizations based on observed performance patterns, reducing manual intervention while maintaining high measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If all possible search attributes are indexed, then search efficiency is maximized, but it is not practical for large information directories

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesearch efficiencyVSAvoidindexing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of uniformly indexing all attributes across the entire directory, the system applies indexing selectively based on local performance needs. By identifying specific search templates that exhibit slow performance, the system indexes only the attributes relevant to those particular search patterns, optimizing search efficiency for critical queries while avoiding the complexity of indexing everything.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts indexing parameters based on observed search performance. Rather than using a static all-or-nothing indexing approach, it modifies indexing parameters (which attributes to index) based on performance measurements and template analysis, achieving high search efficiency with manageable complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Ease of operation

If administrators manually scan logs to identify repeatedly slow searches, then search templates can be tuned, but time is lost and large amounts of data storage are needed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesearch template tuningVSAvoidmanual analysis time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical process of scanning and analyzing logs with an automated computational system. The server automatically performs template identification, performance measurement, and analysis using algorithms rather than human operators, dramatically reducing the time required while maintaining ease of operation through automated reporting and recommendations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS10394771B2Use of search templates to identify slow information server search patterns
Publication Date: 2019.08.27 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US10394771B2 patent drawing
  • US10394771B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Statistical information related to performing information searches based on search templates may be automatically generated and stored in statistical records. The statistical records may be automatically updated. The statistical records may be sorted to indicate which information searches are most efficient.