LDPC Decoder Parallel Architecture With Router-Free Cyclic Shifts

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing low density parity check (LDPC) decoders face challenges in reducing message storage memory and message routing logic, particularly in parallel implementations, which can lead to complex interconnect issues.

Innovation Solution

The proposed LDPC decoder employs a check node unit (CNU) with a set of comparators that compare stored minimum values to a received variable message, reducing the number of comparators needed and optimizing message processing. Additionally, the decoder incorporates a method for cyclic shift processing without active routers, simplifying interconnects and enhancing parallelization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a parallel LDPC decoder implementation is used, then decoding speed and productivity are improved, but device complexity and interconnect issues worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecoding speedVSAvoidinterconnect complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The decoder is divided into multiple check node units (CNUs), each processing a specific subset of parity check equations. This segmentation allows parallel processing of different code blocks simultaneously, improving decoding speed while keeping each CNU's internal logic relatively simple and manageable

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a hierarchical processing structure where CNUs process data in stages (first stage, second stage, third stage). This multi-dimensional processing approach allows the system to achieve high parallelism through time-staged processing rather than requiring all processors to operate simultaneously with complex interconnects

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Measurement precision

If the number of comparators in each CNU is increased, then measurement precision and minimum value determination accuracy are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveminimum value determination accuracyVSAvoidcomparator logic complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Each CNU uses a limited set of comparators (first comparator, second comparator, third comparator) to determine the two minimum values needed for decoding. Rather than using an exhaustive number of comparators to check all possible values, the patent applies partial action by strategically comparing only the necessary minimum values, achieving sufficient precision with reduced complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary sorting and selection of minimum values within each CNU before passing results to the next processing stage. This preliminary action ensures that only the essential minimum values are transmitted forward, maintaining accuracy while reducing the complexity of subsequent processing stages

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Adaptability or versatility

If active routers are used for cyclic shift processing, then message routing flexibility is improved, but device complexity and interconnect issues worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemessage routing flexibilityVSAvoidrouter logic complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of using complex active routers to dynamically route messages, the patent uses predetermined routing patterns based on the structured LDPC code properties. The routing behavior is essentially copied from the known code structure, eliminating the need for complex decision-making logic in routers while maintaining correct message flow

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

Rather than using active routers to dynamically determine message paths, the patent inverts the approach by using the structured properties of the LDPC code to predeterminedly establish routing patterns. This inversion replaces complex active routing logic with simpler, structure-based routing that achieves the same flexibility through code design rather than hardware complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Data Source

PatentUS20250038768A1Low density parity check decoder
Publication Date: 2025.01.30 TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY
  • US20250038768A1 patent drawing
  • US20250038768A1 patent drawing
  • US20250038768A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and system for decoding low density parity check (LDPC) codes. A method includes performing block parallel processing that initiates processing all non-zero block columns of a plurality (M) of rows of a layer of an LDPC matrix in each clock cycle, where M≤p, and p is a total number of rows in a layer of the LDPC matrix; and updating a P message responsive to determination of a final state for each row of the LDPC matrix. The LDPC matrix includes layers, each comprising a plurality (M) of rows that are processed per clock cycle. Each of the plurality of rows of each of the layers is datawise independent of the rows processed during a previous NP_MAX clock cycles and at least one row in each layer is datawise dependent on a row of an immediately preceding layer, and NP_MAX is greater than one.