Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchanger for LDPE Off-Gas Cooling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional heat exchangers used in high-pressure low-density polyethylene (LDPE) production systems face issues such as high pressure drop, space inefficiency, leakage due to welding points, and corrosion, leading to increased production costs and safety risks.

Innovation Solution

A shell and tube heat exchanger system with tubes extending through a tube sheet to collector conduits, made of corrosion-resistant duplex stainless steel, and a cleaning tool for easy maintenance, reducing leakage and corrosion risks while improving accessibility for cleaning.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If double pipe heat exchangers are used, then heat exchange function is provided, but pressure drop is high and space requirement is large

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheat exchange functionVSAvoidpressure drop
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The heat exchanger is divided into multiple tube bundles arranged in parallel within the shell, allowing the process fluid to be split into multiple streams. This segmentation reduces the flow velocity and pressure drop in each individual tube while maintaining the overall heat exchange capacity through the combined surface area of all tubes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention transitions from a double-pipe configuration to a shell-and-tube configuration, adding spatial dimensions by arranging multiple tubes within a shell volume. This three-dimensional arrangement increases the heat exchange surface area within a compact space, improving heat transfer efficiency while reducing pressure drop compared to series double-pipe exchangers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If double pipe heat exchangers are used, then heat exchange function is provided, but space requirement is large

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheat exchange functionVSAvoidspace requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSVolume of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The heat exchange surface is segmented into multiple tubes of smaller diameter rather than using fewer large-diameter pipes. This allows the total heat exchange area to be packed more efficiently within the shell volume, reducing the overall footprint and space requirement of the heat exchanger.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple tubes are nested within the shell, with tube bundles arranged in a compact configuration. The tubes are positioned closely together in a nested arrangement that maximizes the use of shell volume, achieving high heat exchange capacity in a compact package that requires less space than double-pipe configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

3Strength

If tubes are welded to tube sheet, then structural support is provided, but leakage risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural supportVSAvoidleakage risk
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The tubes are extracted from the welded configuration and instead passed through expansion holes in the tube sheet. This removes the welding operation entirely, eliminating the source of welding-induced stresses and potential leakage paths at the weld joints, while still providing secure structural support through mechanical expansion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The welding mechanism is replaced with a mechanical expansion system. Tubes are inserted through the tube sheet and then expanded mechanically using expansion tools that deform the tube outer surface to create a tight interference fit with the expansion hole, providing structural support and sealing without thermal welding.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Reliability

If conventional tubes are used, then heat exchange function is provided, but cleaning difficulty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheat exchange functionVSAvoidcleaning difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of repair

Solution Approach 1:

The tube ends are extracted from the shell and extended beyond the tube sheet to accessible locations. This allows cleaning tools and procedures to be applied to the tube interiors from the outside, making maintenance and cleaning operations straightforward without requiring shell disassembly or special access procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The tube design incorporates features that facilitate self-cleaning or easy access for cleaning. The extended tube ends and smooth internal surfaces allow process fluids to flush through the tubes effectively, and enable routine maintenance personnel to access and clean tubes using standard tools without requiring specialized equipment or complex procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

5Ease of manufacture

If carbon steel tubes are used, then cost is reduced, but corrosion resistance decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovecostVSAvoidcorrosion resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The heat exchanger employs composite construction with corrosion-resistant alloy tubes (such as stainless steel) installed within a carbon steel shell. This composite structure provides the corrosion resistance needed for the process fluid contact surfaces while utilizing the cost-effective carbon steel for the shell and non-contact components, achieving an optimal balance between durability and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system minimizes pressure drop, reduces space requirements, and enhances safety by eliminating welding-related leaks and corrosion, while facilitating easy cleaning and maintenance, thus improving the efficiency and longevity of the heat exchanger.

Implementation Method 1

Heat is transferred from the off-gas to the cooling water, thereby cooling the off-gas

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat transfer: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 2

The nozzle is aligned with the plugged tube and a fluid stream is passed through the nozzle to impact the interior of the tube at a pressure sufficient to remove the plug

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImpact force cleaning: Impact Force

Data Source

PatentEP4107462B1Systems for cooling recycled off-gas in low-density polyethylene production
Publication Date: 2024.08.07 EXXONMOBIL CHEMICAL PATENTS INC
  • EP4107462B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4107462B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4107462B1 patent drawingFigure 3A

AI summary

Improved heat exchanger systems and processes for cooling recycled off-gas in high pressure low-density polyethylene production. A system for exchanging heat between a first material and a second material can include a shell for containing the first material therein, a plurality of tubes disposed within the shell for containing the second material therein, a tube sheet disposed at an end of the shell for restricting flow of the second material to the shell, and at least one collector conduit disposed exterior to the shell for receiving at least one end of the plurality of tubes, wherein at least one of the plurality of tubes extend through the tube sheet to the collector conduit. A cleaning tool can be disposed within the collector conduit for cleaning the tubes. A process for cooling a gas stream can include introducing the gas stream to the heat exchanger system provided herein.