Landfill Leachate Treatment via Coagulation and Reverse Osmosis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for treating landfill leachate are inefficient and costly due to inhibition of activated sludge by high ammonia nitrogen compounds, requiring pre-removal and resulting in secondary pollution, and are characterized by high equipment and operating costs associated with complex biological degradation processes.

Innovation Solution

A method involving coagulative settling, three-stage filtration using specific cartridge filters, and reverse osmosis followed by treatment with chlorine-based oxidants to reduce contaminants, including ammonia nitrogen compounds, with a focus on physical and chemical processes for efficient contaminant removal.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If biological degradation methods (activated sludge) are used to treat landfill leachate, then organic substances can be degraded, but the high ammonia nitrogen compounds inhibit the leachate-degrading activity of activated sludge

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveleachate degradation efficiencyVSAvoidactivated sludge activity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by removing ammonia nitrogen compounds through coagulative settling before the biological degradation stage. This pre-treatment step eliminates the inhibitory effect of ammonia nitrogen on activated sludge, ensuring the biological degradation process can proceed efficiently without interference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If pre-removal of ammonia nitrogen compounds is performed, then activated sludge degradation efficiency is improved, but ammonia nitrogen compounds are discharged directly into the atmosphere causing secondary pollution

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveleachate degradation efficiencyVSAvoidsecondary pollution
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter of ammonia nitrogen removal by using coagulative settling instead of traditional methods that release ammonia into the atmosphere. This physical-chemical process transforms ammonia nitrogen from a gaseous emission into a solid precipitate that can be safely disposed of, eliminating secondary pollution while maintaining degradation efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If Membrane Bioreactor and Continuous Membrane Filtration methods are used, then purification can be achieved, but equipment and operating costs are high due to complexity and cost of hollow fiber membranes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepurification qualityVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces expensive, complex hollow fiber membranes with simpler, more economical filtration systems. The coagulative settling process combined with basic filtration achieves comparable purification quality without the high equipment costs and operational complexity associated with membrane bioreactors and continuous membrane filtration systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

4Productivity

If biological degradation processes are used, then organic substances can be degraded, but the processes are inefficient and expensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveorganic substance degradationVSAvoidprocess cost and efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the treatment process into distinct stages: coagulative settling for ammonia nitrogen removal, followed by biological degradation for organic substance decomposition. This segmentation allows each process to operate optimally without interference, improving overall efficiency and reducing costs compared to integrated biological systems that must accommodate multiple contaminants simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method significantly reduces contaminants, achieving 99% removal of organic substances, heavy metals, and COD/BOD, while being cost-effective and simpler to maintain than existing biological methods, meeting discharge and consumption standards with reduced ammonia nitrogen levels.

Implementation Method 1

coagulatively settling of landfill leachate to produce a supernatant liquid

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCoagulation: Coagulation

Implementation Method 2

suspended solids, such as sludge and other solid particles in landfill leachate, are settled

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSedimentation: Sedimentation

Implementation Method 3

filtering the first filtered liquid in a reverse osmosis apparatus to produce a second filtered liquid

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReverse osmosis: Reverse Osmosis

Implementation Method 4

treating said second filtered liquid with a chlorine-based oxidant

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOxidation: Oxidation

Data Source

PatentUS7517456B2Method for treating landfill leachate
Publication Date: 2009.04.14 JIANGXI JDL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION CO LTD
  • US7517456B2 patent drawing
  • US7517456B2 patent drawing
  • US7517456B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods for treating landfill leachate taught herein comprise: (a) coagulatively settling leachate; (b) filtering the resultant supernatant liquid through multistage cartridges; (c) filtering the filtered liquid by reverse osmosis; and (d) treating the resultant liquid with chlorine-based oxidant. These methods provide the advantages of efficient wastewater treatment, compact equipment size, short process flow, and low startup and operational costs.