Lead Time Prediction Algorithm for Delivery Logistics

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Legacy logistical management systems fail to accurately estimate wait times for delivery lead times due to simplistic methods that do not consider various factors such as the number of drivers, their locations, and past behaviors, leading to inaccurate total delivery period estimates.

Innovation Solution

An optimized lead-time algorithm that determines all possible solicitation sequences for drivers, estimates probabilities and durations using trained machine learning models, and incorporates these into the estimated total delivery time, while constraining sequences with thresholds to reduce computation time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If a static value is added to estimate wait time, then the estimation method is simple, but the accuracy of delivery time estimation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of estimation methodVSAvoidaccuracy of wait time estimation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from using a static wait time value to dynamically calculating wait time based on multiple parameters including driver response probabilities, driver locations, order characteristics, and historical behavior data. This parameter change enables accurate estimation while accounting for the complex interactions between multiple factors affecting driver acceptance decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary computational layer that processes multiple input factors (driver metrics, order details, location data, historical patterns) to generate a probabilistic wait time estimate. This intermediary layer reconciles the complexity of multiple影响因素 with the need for a single actionable delivery time estimate presented to the customer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If all possible solicitation sequences are evaluated, then the accuracy of wait time estimation is improved, but the computation time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of wait time estimationVSAvoidcomputation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system evaluates a representative subset of solicitation sequences rather than exhaustively processing all possible sequences. By using machine learning models trained on historical data, the system identifies and prioritizes the most probable sequence patterns, achieving accurate wait time estimation while avoiding the computational burden of evaluating every theoretical sequence combination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-training machine learning models on extensive historical driver behavior data before actual delivery requests are processed. This pre-computation of driver response patterns and sequence probabilities enables rapid real-time estimation without requiring exhaustive analysis of all possible sequences during the actual order fulfillment process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If multiple driver factors and order characteristics are considered, then the accuracy of delivery time estimation is improved, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of delivery time estimationVSAvoidcomplexity of estimation system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs universal machine learning models that can process multiple different input factors (driver location, driver history, order type, package characteristics, time of day, weather conditions) through a unified computational framework. This multi-functional approach allows the same core algorithm to accommodate diverse影响因素 without requiring separate specialized systems for each factor, thereby managing complexity while maintaining comprehensive analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback loops where actual driver responses and delivery outcomes are continuously fed back into the machine learning models to refine and update driver behavior patterns and sequence probabilities. This feedback mechanism allows the system to adapt to changing conditions and improve accuracy over time without requiring manual reconfiguration of the complex multi-factor estimation framework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20240062141A1Systems and methods for estimating lead time prediction
Publication Date: 2024.02.22 AIRSPACE TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US20240062141A1 patent drawing
  • US20240062141A1 patent drawing
  • US20240062141A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and system to estimate lead time for delivery of a good is disclosed. In aspects, the method performs steps of: receiving a user request to transport the good; identifying a plurality of drivers for transporting the good within a virtual area; determining an expected response time to receive an acceptance of a job corresponding to the user request from a driver in the plurality of drivers; estimating an expected lead time using the expected response time and an expected travel time; and transmitting the expected lead time to the user.