Lead Valuation Modeling for Enterprise-Value Marketing Decisions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current marketing systems lack the ability to automate the processing of customer leads to identify the most valuable leads based on their potential impact on company valuation.

Innovation Solution

A method and system utilizing ensemble machine learning models to assess transaction values for potential customers, considering factors like cost of customer acquisition, customer lifetime value, and return on capital, to determine marketing actions that positively impact enterprise valuation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If automated lead processing is implemented using machine learning models, then lead identification accuracy and enterprise valuation impact are improved, but system complexity and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelead identification accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the lead processing task into multiple independent machine learning models (e.g., lead scoring model, valuation impact model, prioritization model) that can be developed, trained, and maintained separately. Each model focuses on a specific aspect of lead evaluation, reducing the complexity of any single model while achieving high overall accuracy through ensemble methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary optimization system that acts as a mediator between lead generation sources and the seller's CRM system. This intermediary layer handles the complex machine learning computations and decision-making, shielding the rest of the system from complexity while providing simplified interfaces for data input and output.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If comprehensive data analysis is performed to assess transaction value, then marketing decision quality is improved, but processing time and computational cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemarketing decision qualityVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-processing and pre-scoring leads as they are generated, rather than waiting for batch processing. Lead scoring models evaluate basic lead attributes immediately upon receipt, and high-priority leads are identified and routed in real-time, reducing the time loss associated with comprehensive analysis by doing critical evaluations upfront.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by implementing a tiered analysis approach where not all leads receive the full comprehensive analysis. Instead, leads are initially screened by lighter models, and only those meeting certain thresholds undergo more intensive valuation impact assessment, reducing overall processing time while maintaining decision quality for the most promising leads.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Speed

If real-time lead assessment is implemented, then marketing response speed is improved, but computational resource consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemarketing response speedVSAvoidcomputational resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements dynamic resource allocation where computational resources are adjusted based on lead volume, priority, and current system load. During periods of high lead volume, the system dynamically scales computing resources or implements queueing mechanisms, while during lower volume periods, more intensive analysis can be performed. This dynamic approach maintains real-time response capability for critical leads while managing overall resource consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS12524775B2Identifying and processing marketing leads that impact a seller's enterprise valuation
Publication Date: 2026.01.13 HSIP INC
  • US12524775B2 patent drawing
  • US12524775B2 patent drawing
  • US12524775B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, methods and computer readable media for automated marketing decisions based on company valuation results derived from ensemble machine learning models include collecting potential customer data for a set of potential customers from a lead source and transmitting the potential customer data to an optimization system. An ensemble machine learning model that establishes a transaction value for each of the set of potential customers based on an enterprise valuation of the seller. A marketing action is then taken. The marketing action may include one or more of budgeting for a transaction with the lead source, targeting communications to members of the set of potential customers, accepting or rejecting members of the set of potential customers, or offloading members of the set of potential customers.