Automated Leader Identification System Using Digital Persona Comparison

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional leader identification methods in organizations are prone to recency and primacy biases, subjective assessments, and limited consideration of all employees, leading to inefficient succession management and high potential attrition.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented system that compares digital personas of employees to known leaders, utilizing internal and external data mining, collaborative assessments, and weighted attribute scoring to objectively rank potential leaders, minimizing human intervention and bias.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If human nomination is used for leader identification, then personal judgment and experience are applied, but subjective bias and recency/primacy effects occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of leader identificationVSAvoidsubjective bias
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical human judgment process with an automated computer-based system that objectively analyzes employee data. The system uses algorithms to process performance metrics, leadership behaviors, and organizational impact data, eliminating subjective biases inherent in human nomination while maintaining reliability in leader identification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a computer-based analysis system as an intermediary between raw employee data and leader identification decisions. This intermediary processes data through standardized algorithms, transforming subjective human judgment into objective, bias-free assessments that reliably identify leadership potential.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If only short-listed/nominated employee profiles are considered, then the selection process is manageable, but all potential leaders are not identified

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveefficiency of selection processVSAvoidpotential leaders missed
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal leadership assessment system that evaluates all employees simultaneously across multiple dimensions. The system handles diverse data types including performance metrics, behavioral observations, and organizational impact, enabling comprehensive identification of potential leaders without requiring separate nomination processes for different employee groups.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service leadership identification by automatically processing and analyzing all employee data without requiring manual nomination. The automated analysis continuously monitors employee performance and leadership behaviors, proactively identifying potential leaders who would otherwise remain unnoticed, thus preventing loss of talented individuals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of operation

If manual leader selection process is used, then personal involvement and judgment are maintained, but the process is time-consuming and inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of selection processVSAvoidtime for leader selection
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the manual, time-consuming leader selection process with an automated computer-based system that continuously analyzes employee data. The system processes performance metrics, leadership behaviors, and organizational impact data automatically, dramatically reducing the time required for leader identification while maintaining operational simplicity through standardized algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements continuous automated analysis of employee data rather than periodic manual assessments. The system continuously monitors performance metrics and leadership behaviors, providing ongoing updates on leadership potential without requiring repeated manual intervention, thus eliminating time loss while maintaining ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

4Device complexity

If conventional leader identification methods are used, then the process is simple, but succession management is inefficient and attrition is high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomplexity of identification systemVSAvoideffectiveness of succession management
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the leader identification process into distinct analytical components: performance metric analysis, leadership behavior assessment, and organizational impact evaluation. Each segment processes specific data types through dedicated algorithms, improving reliability of succession management while managing system complexity through modular, organized analysis structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS10255576B2Computer implemented method and system to identify leaders in various workgroups
Publication Date: 2019.04.09 TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LTD
  • US10255576B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer implemented system and method for identifying leaders in an organization. The system includes two repositories; first that stores information related to existing/known leaders and second that stores tacit and explicit knowledge related to the employees. The repositories store relevant attributes and attribute values of employees and known leaders according to their ranking in their field of activity, to form a digital persona. The digital persona of known leaders is then compared with the digital persona of an employee suitable for the leadership to form a leadership score. A leader is then chosen based on the leadership ranking which is based on leadership score. Thus, the employees, based on circumstances, may get more opportunities to prove their leadership abilities as the leadership ranking changes periodically.