Semiconductor Leadframe Plating Sequence for Rapid Prototyping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current semiconductor leadframe manufacturing processes are not well-suited for low-volume, high-diversity Analog products, as they require significant cycle time and investment for tooling up stamping machines, photomasks, and etching baths, and struggle with rapid prototyping and miniaturization, leading to issues with adhesion and delamination between leadframes and polymeric packages.

Innovation Solution

Changing the leadframe production sequence from conventional cutting followed by plating to plating followed by cutting, using programmable methods like laser jet or electrical discharge machining, which exposes the metal core for oxidation and enhances adhesion by creating rough surfaces, reducing cycle time and initial investment while supporting rapid prototyping and miniaturization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional stamping or etching methods are used for mass production, then production efficiency is improved, but adaptability to low-volume high-diversity products deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction efficiencyVSAvoidadaptability to low-volume high-diversity products
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The leadframe strip is plated with metal layers before cutting, allowing the plating process to be performed once for multiple product variants. This preliminary plating action eliminates the need to re-tool stampers or re-create photomasks for each new product, enabling rapid adaptation to different pin counts and configurations while maintaining production efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention transitions from static, dedicated tooling (stamper, photomask) to a dynamic, programmable cutting system. Computer-controlled cutting equipment can be reprogrammed to produce different leadframe designs without physical tool changes, providing the flexibility needed for low-volume, high-diversity Analog products while maintaining high productivity through automated processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Manufacturing precision

If stampers or photomasks are tooled up for mass production, then manufacturing precision is improved, but cycle time and initial investment increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveleadframe fabrication precisionVSAvoidcycle time and initial investment
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Plating is performed on the complete leadframe strip before cutting into individual leadframes. This preliminary plating action ensures that all metal layers are formed in one continuous process, maintaining manufacturing precision while eliminating the time and cost of re-tooling for each product variant.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention replaces mechanical stampers and photomask-based etching systems with computer-controlled cutting equipment. This substitution eliminates the need for expensive, time-consuming tooling while maintaining cutting precision through digital programming, significantly reducing both initial investment and cycle time for new product introductions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If plating is performed after cutting, then adhesion is improved, but cycle time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadhesion between leadframe and polymeric packageVSAvoidproduction cycle time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The leadframe strip is plated with metal layers before cutting into individual leadframes. This preliminary plating ensures that the metal layers are formed on the complete strip in one continuous process, and the cutting process itself exposes fresh metal surfaces that will oxidize and provide excellent adhesion. This eliminates the need for a separate post-cutting plating step, reducing cycle time while maintaining adhesion quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the sequence parameter from conventional (cutting then plating) to inverted (plating then cutting). This parameter change allows the plating process to be performed on the complete strip, and the subsequent cutting exposes fresh metal surfaces that naturally oxidize to provide excellent adhesion, eliminating the need for additional plating steps and reducing overall production cycle time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Ease of manufacture

If conventional cutting methods are used, then ease of manufacture is maintained, but ability to support rapid prototyping and miniaturization deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of leadframe fabricationVSAvoidability to support rapid prototyping and miniaturization
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The invention replaces conventional mechanical cutting methods with computer-controlled cutting equipment. This substitution maintains ease of manufacture through automated processing while enabling rapid prototyping and miniaturization through programmable control. The computer-controlled system can quickly adapt to different designs and scales without requiring new tooling, supporting both high-volume production and low-volume prototyping with equal ease.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces cycle time and initial investment, enhances adhesion between leadframes and polymeric encapsulations, and supports rapid prototyping and miniaturization, improving the reliability and flexibility of leadframe production for Analog products by creating denser interconnections and reducing delamination risks.

Implementation Method 1

electrical discharge machining

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical discharge machining: Electrical Discharge Machining

Implementation Method 2

laser jet

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser ablation: Laser Ablation

Implementation Method 3

exposes the metal core for oxidation and enhances adhesion by creating rough surfaces

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOxidation: Oxidation

Data Source

PatentUS8669647B2Method for semiconductor leadframes in low volume and rapid turnaround
Publication Date: 2014.03.11 TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC
  • US8669647B2 patent drawing
  • US8669647B2 patent drawing
  • US8669647B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A leadframe for a QFN/SON semiconductor device comprising a strip of a first metal as the leadframe core with a plurality of leads and a pad. a layer of a second metal over both surfaces of the strip. There are sidewalls normal to the surfaces. The first metal exposed at the sidewalls and at portions of a surface of the pad.