Segmented Leading Edge Cladding for Controlled Fan Blade Tip Separation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Composite fan blades used in turbine engines are prone to brittle fracture and delamination during foreign object impacts due to their low ductility, and conventional cladding designs fail to separate the blade tips from the body during rub events, potentially causing further damage.

Innovation Solution

The airfoil design incorporates a cladding element with a tip portion and a body portion that meet at a boundary, where the leading edge is configured to fail near the boundary when a predetermined force is applied, allowing the tip portion to separate from the body portion, thereby controlling damage and preventing further engine damage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If conventional cladding is applied to composite fan blades, then impact resistance is improved, but the cladding fails to separate during rub events causing further engine damage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact resistanceVSAvoidcontrolled failure during rub events
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The cladding is divided into a body portion and a tip portion that can separate from each other. The body portion remains attached to the composite blade body while the tip portion is configured to separate during rub events, allowing controlled failure that prevents further engine damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different portions of the cladding have different mechanical properties and failure characteristics. The body portion is designed to remain intact and provide ongoing protection, while the tip portion is designed to fail at a predetermined load to prevent catastrophic damage during rub events.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Strength

If carbon composite materials are used for fan blades, then specific strength and light weight are improved, but brittle fracture and delamination susceptibility worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespecific strengthVSAvoidbrittle fracture and delamination susceptibility
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The solution uses a composite structure combining carbon composite material for the blade body with metal cladding elements. The carbon composite provides high specific strength and light weight, while the metal cladding provides ductility and resistance to brittle fracture and delamination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The metal cladding is applied specifically to critical areas (leading edge, tip, and trailing edge) where impact and delamination risks are highest, rather than covering the entire blade. This provides localized protection where needed while maintaining the lightweight composite structure elsewhere.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS11286782B2Multi-material leading edge protector
Publication Date: 2022.03.29 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO
  • US11286782B2 patent drawing
  • US11286782B2 patent drawing
  • US11286782B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An airfoil that includes an airfoil body having a root and a tip, and convex and concave sides that extend between a leading edge and a trailing edge. The airfoil also includes at least a first cladding element that is attached to the airfoil body. The first cladding element includes a first portion and a second portion. The second portion is configured to separate from the first portion when the first cladding element encounters a force of at least a predetermined amount.