Leadless Pacing Device Mode Switching for Undersensing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Leadless pacing devices (LPDs) implanted in the ventricle face challenges in accurately sensing atrial and ventricular electrical activity due to low power electrical signals, leading to undersensing events, which can result in inappropriate pacing modes and reduced synchrony with the heart's natural rhythm.

Innovation Solution

The LPD is configured to switch between sensing without pacing, atrio-ventricular synchronous, and asynchronous ventricular pacing modes based on detection of undersensing events, using a processing module to control the delivery of pacing pulses relative to detected atrial and ventricular activation events, ensuring appropriate pacing therapy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a leadless pacing device is implanted in the ventricle to deliver therapeutic electrical signals, then the device can sense and pace the heart, but the low power electrical signals from the atrium lead to undersensing events and reduced sensing precision

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensing reliabilityVSAvoidsignal detection precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The pacemaker dynamically switches between different pacing modes (DDI, VDD, VVI, VOO) based on detected undersensing events and cardiac rhythm analysis. This dynamic adaptation allows the device to respond to changing sensing conditions and maintain reliable pacing therapy despite signal quality variations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The device continuously monitors for undersensing events by analyzing the absence of expected atrial or ventricular signals within defined time windows. This feedback mechanism triggers mode switching or pacing interventions when undersensing is detected, improving overall sensing reliability through closed-loop control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If the LPD switches between multiple pacing modes to respond to undersensing events, then pacing therapy can be optimized, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepacing mode adaptabilityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control logic is segmented into distinct detection and response modules: undersensing event detection, mode determination, and pacing delivery. Each module handles a specific aspect of the control process, making the overall complex system more manageable and programmable while maintaining versatility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The leadless pacemaker is designed to perform multiple pacing functions (dual chamber pacing, ventricular pacing only, synchronous and asynchronous modes) within a single device. This multi-functionality reduces the need for multiple specialized devices while managing complexity through integrated control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Stability of the object's composition

If the LPD delivers pacing pulses in atrio-ventricular synchronous mode, then cardiac synchrony is improved, but inappropriate pacing may occur due to undersensing events

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecardiac rhythm synchronyVSAvoidpacing appropriateness
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The device performs preliminary detection of undersensing events and evaluates the presence of atrial and ventricular signals before committing to atrio-ventricular synchronous pacing mode. This preliminary assessment prevents inappropriate mode selection and ensures pacing appropriateness before establishing synchronous pacing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Continuous monitoring of atrial and ventricular electrical activity provides feedback to verify proper sensing before and during synchronous pacing. If undersensing is detected during synchronous pacing, the system can switch to alternative modes, maintaining both synchrony when appropriate and reliability through feedback verification

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP3218049B1Mode switching by a ventricular leadless pacing device
Publication Date: 2018.04.04 MEDTRONIC INC
  • EP3218049B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3218049B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3218049B1 patent drawingFigure 3A

AI summary

In some examples, a leadless pacing device (hereinafter, LPD) is configured for implantation in a ventricle of a heart of a patient, and is configured to switch between an atrio-ventricular synchronous pacing mode and an asynchronous ventricular pacing mode in response to detection of one or more sensing events, which may be, for example, undersensing events. In some examples, an LPD is configured to switch from a sensing without pacing mode to an atrio-ventricular synchronous pacing mode in response to determining, for a threshold number of cardiac cycles, a ventricular depolarization was not detected within a ventricular event detection window that begins at an atrial activation event.