Leadless Vagus Microstimulator with Closed-Loop Feedback Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing implantable electrical stimulation devices for treating chronic inflammation lack closed-loop feedback mechanisms, leading to variable and potentially ineffective treatment due to desensitization and patient-to-patient variability, and are susceptible to mechanical damage from bending or flexing.

Innovation Solution

A leadless implantable microstimulator with integral electrodes, configured for closed-loop feedback, is positioned on the vagus nerve using a nerve cuff with a POD to stabilize the device and minimize mechanical stress, and includes a rechargeable power source and control circuitry for precise stimulation based on neural activity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional implantable electrical stimulation devices with separate electrodes and IPG are used, then the device can provide stimulation therapy, but the system is susceptible to mechanical damage from bending or flexing of leads

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice reliabilityVSAvoidmechanical damage from bending or flexing
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the IPG and electrodes into a single integrated microstimulator device that is implanted directly at the nerve site. This eliminates the need for separate lead connections, thereby removing the vulnerability to mechanical damage from bending or flexing while maintaining the stimulation therapy function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts and eliminates the lead component from the traditional stimulation system. By removing the lead that connects the IPG to electrodes, the system eliminates the source of mechanical damage while preserving the essential stimulation function through direct integration of components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Duration of action of stationary object

If open-loop stimulation is used, then the device can provide continuous stimulation, but the treatment becomes variable and potentially ineffective due to desensitization and patient-to-patient variability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontinuous stimulationVSAvoidtreatment efficacy
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of stationary objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements closed-loop feedback control where the microstimulator senses neural activity from the vagus nerve and uses this feedback to adaptively adjust stimulation parameters. This ensures reliable and effective treatment by preventing desensitization and accounting for patient-to-patient variability while maintaining continuous therapy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If a nerve cuff with POD is used to stabilize the microstimulator, then mechanical stress is minimized, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice stabilityVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a nerve cuff with POD as an intermediary structure that stabilizes the microstimulator at the nerve site. This mediator minimizes mechanical stress on the device while the cuff's design accommodates the nerve anatomy, providing stability without excessive complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Reliability

If leadless microstimulator is used, then surgery time is reduced and reliability is increased, but the device requires precise placement and stable positioning

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice reliabilityVSAvoiddevice placement and positioning
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent designs the microstimulator with self-positioning features and stabilization mechanisms that enable the device to secure itself at the nerve site after implantation. This reduces the need for complex external positioning procedures while ensuring reliable and stable placement, thereby improving ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12402826B2Closed-loop vagus nerve stimulation
Publication Date: 2025.09.02 SETPOINT MEDICAL CORP
  • US12402826B2 patent drawing
  • US12402826B2 patent drawing
  • US12402826B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Devices, systems and methods for the treatment of chronic inflammatory disorders that include an implantable microstimulator and an external charger/controller wherein the microstimulator is configured to operate using closed-loop feedback. The feedback for the microstimulator can be electrical activity of the vagus nerve and/or heart sensed by the microstimulator. The feedback can be used to modulate the stimulation duration, intensity, frequency, on-time and off-time.