Longitudinal Leaf Spring with Varying Cross-Section for S-Curvature Compensation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing leaf springs in motor vehicle axles, particularly those made of fiber composite materials, face challenges with durability and service life due to stress changes and S-impact during braking, leading to potential permanent damage and reduced service life.

Innovation Solution

A motor vehicle axle suspension featuring a longitudinal leaf spring with varying cross-sectional sizes along its central axis and a clamping device offset from the center, which compensates for S-curvature by having a larger rear branch cross-sectional size than the front branch, reducing shear stresses and enhancing durability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a longitudinal leaf spring is used to absorb forces in X, Y and Z directions, then the suspension capability is improved, but the spring experiences S-impact during braking leading to increased stress and reduced service life

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesuspension capabilityVSAvoidservice life
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The leaf spring is designed with varying cross-sectional dimensions along its length, with the rear branch having a larger cross-section than the front branch. This local variation in geometry concentrates structural reinforcement exactly where the S-impact generates highest stresses during braking, allowing the spring to withstand multi-directional forces while resisting damage from braking-induced stress concentrations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Weight of moving object

If the leaf spring is made of fiber composite material to reduce weight, then the specific weight is reduced, but shear stresses between layers can cause fiber strands to tear or break

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespecific weightVSAvoidresistance to shear stress
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The invention employs fiber composite material construction for the leaf spring, utilizing multiple layers of fiber-reinforced composites. The varying cross-sectional design works synergistically with the composite material structure to distribute shear stresses across the layered construction, preventing delamination and fiber strand failure while maintaining the lightweight advantage of composite materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The rear branch is designed with a larger cross-sectional size compared to the front branch, creating localized reinforcement in the region most susceptible to S-impact during braking. This geometric variation optimizes the distribution of shear stresses within the fiber composite layers, preventing stress concentrations that would otherwise cause inter-laminar failure or fiber strand tearing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Strength

If the cross-sectional geometry is changed to increase spring rigidity, then the movement of differential housing is restricted, but the weight remains constant compared to conventional springs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespring rigidityVSAvoiddifferential housing movement
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The leaf spring features a non-uniform cross-sectional geometry where the rear branch has a larger cross-section than the front branch. This localized geometric variation increases rigidity precisely in the region subjected to highest braking loads, while the front branch maintains a smaller cross-section that allows greater flexibility for differential housing movement during normal suspension operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design results in a weight-optimized, more durable leaf spring with improved braking behavior and reduced peak stresses, maintaining driving comfort and safety while extending the service life.

Implementation Method 1

the longitudinal leaf spring again has an essentially rectilinear course. Due to the compression or rebound due to the dynamic wheel forces, the course then changes during rebound into a curved course or during compression, especially in the case of strong compression, into a course that is opposite to the originally curved course

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic deformation: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

When the stress conditions change, shear stresses occur within the leaf spring, which can lead to a weakening of the leaf spring between the individual layers

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShear stress distribution: Shear Stress

Data Source

PatentEP2634019B1Motor vehicle axle suspension with longitudinal leaf spring
Publication Date: 2015.04.08 BENTELER SGL
  • EP2634019B1 patent drawingFigure 1a~1c
  • EP2634019B1 patent drawingFigure 2a~2b
  • EP2634019B1 patent drawingFigure 3a~3b

AI summary

The present invention relates to a longitudinal leaf spring designed to optimize stress distribution for the specific case of S-shaped movement during braking. For this purpose, the longitudinal leaf spring has a longitudinally extending cross-sectional area of ​​varying dimensions, which is particularly larger in a central connection area 5 than in the branches 6 extending from the connection area 5.