Dual-Rate Leaf Spring Suspension with Deformable Stop Elements

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing two-stage suspension systems for vehicle axles are bulky and heavy due to the need for additional springs and connecting components, which increases unsprung mass and constructional space, making them inefficient in terms of dynamics and space usage.

Innovation Solution

A compact axle suspension design featuring a longitudinal leaf spring with a concave shape and a connecting arm, where a first stop element on the connecting arm and a second stop element on the vehicle structure are initially spaced apart, but come into contact and deform elastically when a limit load is exceeded, providing a dual-rate suspension with increased stiffness without the need for additional springs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If a secondary spring is added to create a two-stage suspension system, then the spring constant can be increased above a limit load, but the mass of the spring assembly increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespring constantVSAvoidmass of spring assembly
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the geometric parameters of a single leaf spring (thickness variation along its length) to achieve dual-rate suspension characteristics. The spring has a first region with greater thickness for high load support and a second region with lesser thickness for normal operation, eliminating the need for a separate secondary spring and reducing overall mass.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines the functions of primary and secondary springs into a single integrated leaf spring structure. The varying thickness profile of the spring integrates both the soft suspension characteristics for normal loads and the stiff support characteristics for high loads, merging what would traditionally require two separate components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Force

If multiple springs are arranged in a spring assembly, then dual-rate suspension is achieved, but the constructional space required increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespring constantVSAvoidconstructional space
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple spring functions into a single leaf spring with variable thickness. This integration eliminates the need for separate primary and secondary springs, reducing the constructional space required while maintaining the dual-rate suspension capability through the spring's geometric design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

By varying the thickness parameter along the length of the leaf spring, the patent achieves dual-rate suspension characteristics in a single component. This parameter change allows the spring to provide different stiffness levels at different regions, eliminating the need for multiple springs and reducing the space they would occupy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Volume of moving object

If the primary spring is designed to handle all loads, then constructional space is reduced, but the spring constant cannot be increased above a limit load

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconstructional spaceVSAvoidspring constant
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by varying the thickness of the leaf spring along its length. The first region has greater thickness to provide high spring constant for limit loads, while the second region has lesser thickness for normal operation. This allows a single spring to provide both low and high spring constant characteristics at different locations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by giving different thicknesses to different regions of the leaf spring. The first region (for high load) has greater thickness and stiffness, while the second region (for normal operation) has lesser thickness. This local variation in properties allows the spring to handle different load conditions effectively within a single component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design enhances vehicle handling and comfort by adapting to higher loads with increased stiffness, prevents axle collision with the vehicle structure, and reduces unsprung mass and constructional space, resulting in a more efficient and compact suspension system.

Implementation Method 1

at least one stop element is elastically deformable when contacted by the other stop element

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic deformation: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS11001113B2Dual-rate leaf spring suspension for a vehicle
Publication Date: 2021.05.11 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US11001113B2 patent drawing
  • US11001113B2 patent drawing
  • US11001113B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An axle suspension for a vehicle includes a spring assembly with a leaf spring and a connecting arm, wherein the leaf spring supports a vehicle axle and, on an end side, is pivotably connected to a vehicle structure and pivotably connected to the connecting arm. In order to provide an optimized axle suspension with two-stage suspension, the spring assembly in a region of the connecting arm has a first stop element and the vehicle structure has a second stop element, which stop elements under normal load of the vehicle are spaced apart from one another and, when a limit load is exceeded, contact one another, whereby at least one stop element is elastically deformable.