Leaf Spring Trampoline Enclosure for Tool-Free Assembly

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Trampoline enclosures face challenges in providing both strong support and safety during jumps, with existing rigid mesh supports making assembly difficult and requiring tools, while flexible supports may not adequately catch users who fall onto the enclosure netting.

Innovation Solution

A spring connection system between trampoline enclosure poles using leaf springs that are flexible in both horizontal and vertical directions, with a higher vertical spring constant for added stiffness and a buckle mechanism for easy assembly without tools.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If a rigid mesh net support is used, then the support strength is improved, but the assembly difficulty increases and tools are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesupport strengthVSAvoidassembly difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The rigid mesh net support is divided into multiple modular sections that can be independently assembled. Each section contains standardized connection points that allow for tool-free assembly through simple interlocking mechanisms, reducing assembly difficulty while maintaining overall structural strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The support structure incorporates adjustable and movable components that allow users to assemble and configure the mesh net without requiring precise alignment or tools. The dynamic assembly process enables flexible configuration while preserving the rigid support characteristics when assembled.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Strength

If an inflexible support is used, then the strength for retaining a user is improved, but the safety when a user contacts the enclosure support deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveretaining strengthVSAvoidimpact safety
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The support structure employs different material properties in different regions: rigid components provide retaining strength in areas where user support is needed, while flexible or energy-absorbing materials are positioned at contact points to reduce impact injuries when users accidentally touch the enclosure support.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The enclosure support combines multiple materials with complementary properties - rigid structural elements for strength and flexibility or cushioning materials for safety - creating a composite structure that simultaneously achieves both retaining strength and impact safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Stability of the object's composition

If long rods are used for the support frame, then the structural stability is improved, but the assembly difficulty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stabilityVSAvoidassembly difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

Long rods are divided into shorter, manageable sections with standardized connection interfaces. These segmented components maintain the structural stability of the original long rods while being much easier to handle, transport, and assemble without requiring special tools or equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The spring connection system effectively catches users who fall onto the enclosure netting, preventing ground contact and simplifying assembly by eliminating the need for tools and small components, while maintaining structural strength and ease of production.

Implementation Method 1

The leaf spring is flexible in a horizontal direction and in a vertical direction. A leaf spring vertical dimension is greater than the leaf spring horizontal dimension. A horizontal spring constant of the leaf spring, and a vertical spring constant of the leaf spring are different. The horizontal spring constant is less than the vertical spring constant so that the leaf spring is resiliently flexible in a vertical direction and in a horizontal direction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS10188888B2Spring enclosed trampoline
Publication Date: 2019.01.29 CHEN SAMUEL
  • US10188888B2 patent drawing
  • US10188888B2 patent drawing
  • US10188888B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A spring enclosure trampoline includes a trampoline bed connected across a horizontal frame member. The trampoline bed is supported by a plurality of springs. Trampoline legs support the horizontal frame member above a ground surface. A trampoline enclosure supports a trampoline enclosure net from a spring enclosure netting support. The trampoline enclosure surrounds the trampoline bed and the trampoline enclosure is supported on a trampoline pole. The spring enclosure netting support is formed as a leaf spring. The leaf spring is flexible in a horizontal direction and in a vertical direction. A leaf spring vertical dimension is greater than the leaf spring horizontal dimension. A horizontal spring constant of the leaf spring, and a vertical spring constant of the leaf spring are different.