Leak Detection in Thermodynamic Cycles via Sub-cooling Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In thermodynamic cycle devices like ORC systems without a feed tank, conventional level sensors cannot accurately determine the filling quantity, making it difficult to detect leaks, especially during operation, and failing to comply with regulations such as (EC) No. 842/2006 regarding fluorinated greenhouse gases.

Innovation Solution

A method that determines sub-cooling in the condenser by calculating the difference between the condensation temperature and the temperature of the fluid exiting the condenser, allowing for leak detection by monitoring changes in sub-cooling and filling quantity, which can be calculated using relationships between sub-cooling and filling quantity, without the need for conventional level sensors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional level sensors are used to determine filling quantity, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity increases and cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefilling quantity determinationVSAvoidsensor installation
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses its own operational parameters (condensation temperature, fluid exit temperature, pressure) to determine filling quantity through sub-cooling calculations, eliminating the need for external level sensors. The thermodynamic cycle device monitors its own state to self-diagnose filling levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the measurement approach from direct level sensing to indirect parameter measurement. By measuring temperature and pressure parameters and calculating sub-cooling, the system derives filling quantity information without physical level sensors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If conventional leak detection methods are used at standstill, then detection capability is achieved, but ease of operation deteriorates and productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveleak detection capabilityVSAvoiddetection process
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors sub-cooling parameters during normal operation to detect leaks, eliminating the need to stop the system for inspection. Leak detection becomes a continuous process integrated into normal operation rather than a separate shutdown procedure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention replaces mechanical/physical search methods (refrigerant detectors, leak detection spray) with a thermodynamic parameter-based detection system that uses temperature and pressure measurements to identify leaks through sub-cooling analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Device complexity

If the system operates without a feed tank, then device complexity is reduced, but measurement precision of filling quantity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem structureVSAvoidfilling level determination
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The invention measures filling quantity indirectly through thermodynamic parameters (sub-cooling temperature difference) rather than direct level measurement. This allows accurate filling determination in a tankless system by monitoring the temperature difference between condensation and fluid exit temperatures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The sub-cooling temperature difference acts as an intermediary parameter that links the presence/quantity of working medium to measurable temperature and pressure values. This intermediary enables filling quantity determination without direct level sensing in the absence of a feed tank.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables accurate leak detection during operation, complies with regulatory requirements, and reduces the need for additional sensors, allowing for predictive maintenance to prevent system failure and minimize service intervals.

Implementation Method 1

a condenser for condensing vaporous working medium

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCondensation: Condensation

Implementation Method 2

the fluid working medium is sub-cooled, i.e. is cooled to a temperature which is below the condensation temperature

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSub-cooling: Supercooling

Data Source

PatentUS10352197B2Device and method for recognizing leaks in closed circular processes
Publication Date: 2019.07.16 ORCAN ENERGY AG
  • US10352197B2 patent drawing
  • US10352197B2 patent drawing
  • US10352197B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for detecting a leak in a thermodynamic cycle device with a condenser for condensing vaporous working medium, comprising the following steps: determining sub-cooling of the working medium in the condenser, wherein sub-cooling is determined as a difference between a condensation temperature in the condenser and a temperature of a liquid working medium exiting the condenser; detecting a leak in the event that the sub-cooling determined differs from a setpoint value for the sub-cooling or in the event that a filling quantity of the working medium in the thermodynamic cycle device, being determined from the determined sub-cooling, differs from a setpoint value for the filling quantity. The invention further relates to a corresponding computer program product and to a corresponding device.