Lean Production Resource Capacity Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for calculating resource capacities in lean production environments, such as print shops, often lead to overestimation due to uniform demand assumptions, resulting in excessive capacity requirements and inefficiencies, especially with demand fluctuations and multiple resources competing to satisfy balanced workflows.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a multi-objective optimization using linear programming (LP) and a generalized geometrical algorithm to determine minimal resource capacities by estimating peak-demand production rates, allowing for hierarchical calculation of resource capacities based on prioritized resources, thereby optimizing resource utilization and reducing unnecessary capacity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If conventional uniform demand assumptions are used to calculate resource capacities, then resource capacity calculations are simplified, but overestimation of peak demand rates occurs leading to excessive capacity requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalculation complexityVSAvoidresource capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the calculation parameters from uniform demand assumptions to time-varying demand rates that account for job arrival patterns and due dates. By using job-specific time segments and calculating demand rates as q_j/(t_j2-t_j1) for each job, the system transforms the oversimplified uniform model into a more accurate time-dependent model that reduces overestimation while maintaining computational feasibility through structured parameter organization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple resources are utilized to satisfy balanced lean workflow, then resource flexibility increases, but resources compete against one another requiring complex capacity balancing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource flexibilityVSAvoidcapacity balancing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the multiple resources into a hierarchical structure with one critical resource and several substitute resources. This segmentation allows the system to manage complexity by treating resources differently - the critical resource determines the base production rate while substitute resources provide flexibility through defined substitution rules. The segmentation transforms the complex multi-resource balancing problem into a more manageable structure with clear roles for each resource type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a workflow management system as an intermediary that coordinates resource allocation and handles the complexity of multi-resource balancing. This intermediary layer manages the competition between resources by implementing substitution rules and capacity balancing logic, shielding the core production process from the complexity of direct resource coordination while enabling flexible resource utilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Ease of operation

If conventional takt-time calculation is used, then resource capacity estimation is straightforward, but substantial overestimation of necessary capacities results

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalculation easeVSAvoiddemand rate accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the demand rate calculation from the conventional uniform takt-time assumption to a time-varying model that uses job-specific parameters. Instead of assuming constant demand throughout the time segment, the system calculates demand rates as q_j/(t_j2-t_j1) for each job j, where t_j1 and t_j2 are the arrival and due dates. This parameter change enables more accurate measurement of peak demand rates while maintaining structured calculation procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS7379206B2Methods and systems for determining resource capabilities for a lean production environment
Publication Date: 2008.05.27 XEROX CORP
  • US7379206B2 patent drawing
  • US7379206B2 patent drawing
  • US7379206B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A plurality of printing jobs associated with a printing environment can be initially evaluated. Such a printing environment can be implemented as a print shop or another lean document production environment. A set of minimal resource capacities can then be calculated as a multi-objective optimization using a linear programming (LP) analysis. Alternatively, in a generalized geometrical algorithm, at least one peak-demand production rate associated with the most critical resource can first be estimated, in response to evaluating the plurality of printing jobs. Thereafter, minimal resource capacities of the plurality of resources of the printing environment can be hierarchically calculated based on estimating the previously determined peak-demand production rate of higher priority.