Learned Neural Optimizer for Validation-Guided Network Training

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing neural network training methods rely on fixed optimizers that do not adapt to the specific characteristics of the network being trained, leading to suboptimal performance and increased computational resources.

Innovation Solution

Implementing an optimizer neural network that generates parameter updates based on additional features like validation loss, allowing it to adapt to the trainee neural network's specific needs, thereby improving training efficiency and performance without requiring additional regularization terms.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional fixed optimizers are used for training neural networks, then the training process is simple and computationally efficient, but the performance is suboptimal and additional manual regularization is required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining performanceVSAvoidoptimizer complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The optimizer neural network automatically performs optimization tasks that would otherwise require manual intervention. It self-adjusts hyperparameters and regularization strength based on validation loss, eliminating the need for user-specified hyperparameters and manual regularization terms while achieving superior training performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes optimization parameters during training by using validation loss to automatically adjust regularization strength and other hyperparameters. This allows the optimizer to adapt to changing training conditions without requiring manual intervention or fixed hyperparameter settings

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If additional features like validation loss are incorporated into the optimizer, then training performance improves and computational resources are reduced, but the optimizer complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining efficiencyVSAvoidoptimizer structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The optimizer neural network serves multiple functions simultaneously: it performs parameter optimization, automatically regularizes training through validation loss, adapts to changing hyperparameters and architectures, and eliminates the need for separate regularization terms. This multi-functionality achieves superior training efficiency without requiring multiple separate components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If user-specified hyperparameters and manual regularization terms are used, then the training process is controllable and transparent, but the performance is limited and requires additional computational resources

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel performanceVSAvoidcomputational resources
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The optimizer neural network automatically determines the appropriate regularization strength and hyperparameter values by analyzing validation loss, eliminating the need for manual specification. This self-service approach achieves superior model performance while reducing computational resources by removing redundant manual intervention steps

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12619879B2Training neural networks using learned optimizers
Publication Date: 2026.05.05 GOOGLE LLC
  • US12619879B2 patent drawing
  • US12619879B2 patent drawing
  • US12619879B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and apparatus, including computer programs encoded on computer storage media, for training a neural network. One of the methods includes performing, using a plurality of training examples, a training step to obtain respective gradients of a loss function with respect to each of the parameters in the parameter tensors; obtaining a validation loss for a plurality of validation examples that are different from the plurality of training examples generating an optimizer input from at least the respective gradients and the validation loss; processing the optimizer input using an optimizer neural network to generate an output defining a respective update for each of the parameters in the parameter tensors of the neural network; and for each of the parameters in the parameter tensors, applying the respective update to a current value of the parameter to generate an updated value for the parameter.