Learning Curve Profitability Modeling System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Manufacturing industries face challenges in determining the optimal learning curve value and associated profitability and costs of a good, as current techniques fail to adequately address questions regarding research and development investments, trade-offs between recurring and nonrecurring costs, and profit maximization, often relying on managerial judgment rather than data-driven methods.

Innovation Solution

The development of systems, methods, and computer program products that determine a learning curve value by modeling profitability as a function of potential learning curve values, accounting for uncertainty in costs and market variability, and optimizing profitability by selecting a learning curve that maximizes profits, while also modeling demand and associated costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If managerial judgment is used to determine learning curve value and profitability, then decision-making speed is improved, but measurement precision and data-driven accuracy deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecision-making speedVSAvoidprofitability measurement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual managerial judgment with an automated computer-based modeling system that calculates learning curve values and profitability metrics. The system uses mathematical models to process cost data, demand data, and learning curve parameters automatically, eliminating the need for manual estimation while providing precise, data-driven results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service decision-making by providing automated calculations and analyses that allow managers to independently determine optimal learning curve values and profitability without requiring external consulting or complex manual analysis. The computer program product performs all necessary calculations autonomously based on input data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Device complexity

If traditional cost analysis methods are used, then simplicity of analysis is maintained, but the ability to account for market uncertainties and variability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanalysis complexityVSAvoidaccounting for market uncertainty
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates variability and uncertainty by using ranges and distributions for key parameters such as cost estimates, demand forecasts, and learning curve rates. The system performs sensitivity analyses by varying these parameters to determine how changes affect profitability, providing a more robust understanding of market uncertainties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system goes beyond traditional cost analysis by incorporating additional factors such as demand variability, market conditions, and multiple scenario analyses. This excessive action ensures that all relevant uncertainties are accounted for, providing a comprehensive view of potential outcomes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Measurement precision

If detailed modeling of profitability and costs is performed, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity and computational requirements worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprofitability modeling accuracyVSAvoidmodeling system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the profitability analysis into distinct modular components: cost modeling module, demand modeling module, learning curve calculation module, and profitability optimization module. Each module handles a specific aspect of the analysis independently, making the overall complex system manageable and easier to implement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses intermediate calculations and auxiliary variables to bridge complex relationships. For example, it calculates intermediate metrics such as unit costs at different production volumes, marginal costs, and break-even points before arriving at final profitability measures, simplifying the computational process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS7599849B2Systems, methods and computer program products for determining a learning curve value and modeling associated profitability and costs of a good
Publication Date: 2009.10.06 THE BOEING CO
  • US7599849B2 patent drawing
  • US7599849B2 patent drawing
  • US7599849B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, methods and computer program products for determining a learning curve value and modeling an associated profitability of a good are provided. According to one method of determining a learning curve value, recurring costs of producing each unit of the good are modeled as a function of potential learning curve values. Nonrecurring costs of producing each unit of the good are then modeled as a function of potential learning curve values. Next, the learning curve value is determined based upon the recurring costs model and the nonrecurring costs value such that the sum of the recurring costs and nonrecurring costs at the determined learning curve value is minimized over the potential learning curve values.