Personalized Learning Guidance via Answer Status Transitions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional techniques fail to provide learning guidance that takes into account a user's behavior during a test, which is reflective of their personality and learning style, thereby limiting the effectiveness of learning support.

Innovation Solution

A learning support device that acquires the transition of answer status from operation history information, estimates the user's understanding level based on scoring results, and generates personalized learning guidance tailored to the user's behavior and understanding level.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional CBT systems only use scoring results to estimate understanding level, then the estimation process is simple, but the learning guidance cannot be tailored to user personality and behavior patterns

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepersonalization of learning guidanceVSAvoidcomplexity of analysis system
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the user's test-taking process into multiple discrete answer status transitions (e.g., reading question, answering, reviewing, modifying). Each transition is tracked separately to build a comprehensive behavior profile, enabling personalized guidance without overwhelming system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring answer status transitions and using this information to generate adaptive learning guidance. The guidance is tailored based on observed behavior patterns, creating a closed-loop system that adapts to individual users

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Loss of information

If the system tracks detailed operation history information including question selection and character input operations, then user behavior analysis becomes possible, but the data processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompleteness of user behavior dataVSAvoidcomplexity of data processing
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential answer status transitions from the complete operation history, separating relevant behavioral data from redundant input details. This extraction approach preserves necessary behavior information while simplifying subsequent analysis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary processing of operation history data during test-taking to identify and record answer status transitions in real-time. This preliminary action organizes raw data into meaningful behavioral patterns before final analysis, reducing later processing complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If the system analyzes answer status transitions to provide personalized guidance, then learning efficiency improves, but the computational resources required increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelearning efficiencyVSAvoidcomputational resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by focusing analysis only on answer status transitions rather than processing all operation details. This selective approach provides sufficient behavioral insight for personalization while consuming fewer computational resources

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20250029512A1Learning support device, learning support method, and recording medium
Publication Date: 2025.01.23 OMRON CORP
  • US20250029512A1 patent drawing
  • US20250029512A1 patent drawing
  • US20250029512A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Learning guidance tailored to personality, etc., of a user is provided to improve learning efficiency of the user.A transition acquisition section acquires transition of answer status of a user to questions on a test based on operation history information indicating a history of input operations performed by the user on a terminal when the user takes the test. An understanding level estimation section estimates level of understanding of the user of the respective questions on the test using scoring results of answers of the user. A guidance generation section generates guidance regarding learning guidance for the user based on the transition of the answer status of the user acquired by the transition acquisition section and the level of understanding of the respective questions on the test estimated by the understanding level estimation section.