Learning Model Construction for Scale Estimation in Noisy Images

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In environments with limited light, such as indoors, image noise in concrete structure imaging complicates accurate scale estimation using conventional methods.

Innovation Solution

A learning model construction device and method that utilizes multiple loss functions to build and select the most accurate learning models for scale estimation, incorporating teacher data with known scales, and verifies correlations to enhance accuracy in noisy indoor conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional scale estimation methods are used in low-light indoor environments, then the estimation process can be performed, but the accuracy of scale estimation deteriorates due to image noise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescale estimation accuracyVSAvoidimage noise
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the scale estimation problem by creating multiple specialized learning models, each trained with different loss functions tailored to handle specific noise conditions in low-light environments. This segmentation allows the system to address different aspects of noise interference through dedicated models rather than a single general-purpose model.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameters of the learning models by employing multiple different loss functions (e.g., L1 loss, L2 loss, Huber loss) with varying characteristics. Each loss function parameterizes the optimization objective differently, enabling the models to adapt to different noise patterns and lighting conditions, thereby improving scale estimation accuracy in noisy indoor environments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If multiple learning models with different loss functions are constructed, then the accuracy of scale estimation can be improved, but the complexity of the system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescale estimation accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces dynamics by implementing a selection mechanism that adaptively chooses the most appropriate learning model based on the characteristics of the input image or verification results. This dynamic selection process allows the system to manage multiple models efficiently, activating only the necessary models for each specific estimation task, thereby balancing accuracy improvement with system complexity management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs feedback mechanisms where verification images with known true scales are used to evaluate the performance of different learning models. The correlation between estimated scales and true scales is calculated, and this feedback information is used to select or refine the optimal model, creating a closed-loop system that manages complexity through performance-driven model selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If verification with optimal verification images is performed to select the best learning model, then the reliability of scale estimation is improved, but the time required for model selection increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescale estimation reliabilityVSAvoidmodel selection time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-training multiple learning models with different loss functions using training images before actual scale estimation is needed. The models are prepared in advance and can be quickly evaluated using verification images, significantly reducing the time required during operational phases while maintaining high reliability through pre-established model performance characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses partial verification action by selecting a limited number of representative verification images with known scales to evaluate and compare learning models, rather than exhaustively testing all possible images. This partial verification approach achieves sufficient reliability for model selection without incurring excessive time costs, balancing thoroughness with efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20250022260A1Learning model building device, prediction device, learning model building method, prediction method, and program
Publication Date: 2025.01.16 NIPPON TELEGRAPH & TELEPHONE CORP
  • US20250022260A1 patent drawing
  • US20250022260A1 patent drawing
  • US20250022260A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A learning model construction device (3A) according to the present disclosure includes: a plurality of learning units (354-k) that constructs a respective plurality of learning models by using a respective plurality of loss functions different from each other on the basis of teacher data in which image data indicating a learning image is associated with a true value of a scale of the learning image; a plurality of verification units (355-k) that respectively calculates, for an optimal verification image, a plurality of estimated values; a plurality of correlation calculation units (356-k) that calculates respective correlations of the true value with the plurality of estimated values of the scale; and an optimal learning model selection unit (357) that selects an optimal learning model that is a learning model of which a corresponding one of the correlations is the highest.